Radiation Effective Doses to Adults Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies

Dysphagia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer V. Tipnis ◽  
Walter Huda ◽  
Janina Wilmskoetter ◽  
Bonnie Martin-Harris ◽  
Heather Shaw Bonilha
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Cmelak ◽  
Mary S. Dietrich ◽  
Shuli Li ◽  
Sheila Ridner ◽  
Arlene Forastiere ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We conducted a correlative study for E2399, a function preservation trial for resectable locally advanced oropharynx and larynx cancer, to prospectively assess effects of chemoradiation (CCR) on quality of life (QOL), swallowing and voice. We correlated the results of swallow assessments done via questionnaires and objective assessments by modified barium swallow (MBS). Methods The Functional Assessment of Cancer-HN (FACT-HN), the Performance Status Scale – Head and Neck (PSS-HN), swallow assessments (including modified barium swallow studies), and voice assessments: Voice Handicap Index (VHI), the Voice Disability Assessment (VDA), and American Speech-Language Hearing Association’s Functional Communication Measure (FCM) were conducted at baseline and periodically post-treatment for 2 years. Results Baseline QOL and swallowing function predicted overall survival. Patients experienced a marked decrease in QOL, swallowing, and speech post CCR although the decrease in vocal function was modest. Function and QOL returned towards baseline in the majority of patients by 12 months post treatment. Less than 10% of patients had severe dysphagia and were PEG dependent at 12 months post treatment. There was a high degree of correlation between the FACT-HN and PSS-HN swallow items. Statistically significant correlations were found between subjective and objective measures of swallow function. Conclusions Patients experience marked loss in swallowing function post CCR which returned to baseline in the majority of patients. The correlations between the FCM and self-report swallow items on the PSS and FACT-HN appear to be sufficiently strong to justify their use as a surrogate marker for swallowing disability in large therapeutic trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 862-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Wick ◽  
Kaalan Johnson ◽  
Kim Demarre ◽  
Amy Faherty ◽  
Sanjay Parikh ◽  
...  

Objective To assess the reliability and construct validity of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in children. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of pre- and postoperative video modified barium swallow studies from children who underwent interarytenoid injection augmentation for unexplained persistent pharyngeal dysphagia. Two pediatric speech and language pathologists reviewed each study twice in a blinded and randomized fashion. Setting Tertiary academic pediatric hospital. Subjects and Methods Thirty children were identified with adequate pre- and postoperative modified barium swallow studies within 4 weeks of intervention. Children were separated into clinical outcome groups based on ability to advance to thinner diet consistencies postoperatively. Construct validity was assessed with a mixed linear model to test the hypothesis that only the clinically improved group would receive better Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores after surgery. Reliability was assessed by calculating chance-corrected agreement between raters (interrater) and raters’ repeat evaluations (intrarater). Results Inter- and intrarater reliabilities (Cohen’s κ) were both excellent. Results of the mixed model revealed a significant interaction between outcome group and pre- and postoperative time interval. As hypothesized, this involved a significant improvement in Penetration-Aspiration Scale score only in the improved group. Conclusions These findings suggest that the Penetration-Aspiration Scale is a reliable and valid measure of clinical response to interarytenoid injection augmentation in children.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S697
Author(s):  
David Lin ◽  
Jeremy Wang ◽  
Andrew A. Erman ◽  
Dinesh Chhetri ◽  
Conklin Jeffrey

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Gibson ◽  
Debra Phyland ◽  
Ian Marschner

Dysphagia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 896-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Hui-Juan Kooi ◽  
Jasmine Pei-Ling Boo ◽  
Samuel Yong-Ern Ng ◽  
Sanchalika Acharyya ◽  
Kwang-Hwee Goh ◽  
...  

Dysphagia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-541
Author(s):  
Arcangela L. Balest ◽  
Katherine E. White ◽  
Amber D. Shaffer ◽  
Amanda S. Mahoney ◽  
Matthew Georg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 736.e9-736.e12
Author(s):  
S.J. Galgano ◽  
D. Gauntt ◽  
M.R. Boyd ◽  
D. Trahan ◽  
B.E. Jackson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 618-624
Author(s):  
Kendrea L. (Focht) Garand ◽  
Lindsey Culp ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Kate Davidson ◽  
Bonnie Martin-Harris

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine age-related effects on esophageal transit times (ETT) among healthy adult participants. Methods: A total of 175 healthy, non-dysphagic participants underwent a modified barium swallow study (MBSS), and ETT was recorded for two standardized swallowing tasks. Differences across age groups were determined using Kruskal–Wallis test. Relationships between an Esophageal Clearance (Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile Component 17) score and ETT were also explored. Results: No significant differences were observed in ETT across age groups for nectar-thickened liquid ( P = .335) or pudding ( P = .231) consistencies. No significant differences were observed between males and females in ETT for either the nectar ( P = .112) or pudding trial ( P = .817). For nectar, the mean ETT for patients with Component 17 scores of 2 or greater were significantly higher than that of participants with a score of 0 ( P < .0001). For pudding, participants with a score >0 demonstrated significantly higher mean ETT compared to participants with a score of 0 (with P = .0008 and P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Study findings failed to support age-related or sex-related differences in ETT for two standardized swallowing tasks administered during a MBSS in healthy individuals. The normative values following a standardized protocol in this study provide guidance in clinical interpretation of esophageal function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document