Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1280-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Kim ◽  
Y.K. Cho ◽  
S.Y. Kim ◽  
S.K. Park ◽  
M.G. Lee
2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Radovanovic ◽  
Dragana Radovanovic ◽  
Milan Breberina ◽  
Tomislav Petrovic ◽  
Andrija Golubovic ◽  
...  

Introduction Preoperative staging of rectal cancer is considered essential to select patients adequately for different therapeutic regimes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty rectal cancer patients (31 men, 19 women) underwent endorectal ultrasonography with a 7.5-MHz probe. Thirty-eight of these patients had preoperative chemoradiation and in these patients examination was done before and after the radiotherapy treatment. The results of examinations were compared with the histological findings of the resected specimens. RESULTS Histopathology showed 4 stage T0, 3 stage T1, 12 stage T2, 30 stage T3, and one stage T4 tumor. Nodal metastases were seen in 17 patients. The overall accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography for determining the depth of invasion (T stage) was 66% (33/50). The accuracy rate of T1 was 100% (1/1), T2 was 45% (9/20), T3 was 79% (22/28), and T4 was 100% (1/1). Overstaging was 18% (9/50) and understaging 16% (8/50). In staging lymph node metastasis, the overall accuracy rate was 70% (18/25) with 18% (9/50) overstaged and 12% (6/50) understaged. With regard to nodal involvement, sensitivity was 65% and specificity 73%. Regarding penetration of the rectal wall (stages T1 and T2 vs stages T3 and T4 / Dukes' classification A versus B), endorectal sonography showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 74%, 68%, and 72%, respectively. CONCLUSION Endorectal ultrasonography is a valuable diagnostic modality for rectal cancer staging. It is fast, safe, accurate, well tolerated by the patient and cheap procedure and therefore should be used as a diagnostic modality of the first choice in rectal cancer staging although one must take into consideration possible limitations in cases of preoperative chemoradiation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3054-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy C. M. Li ◽  
Shirley Y. W. Liu ◽  
Anthony W. I. Lo ◽  
Sophie S. F. Hon ◽  
Simon S. M. Ng ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Santoro

Endorectal ultrasonography has become important part of preoperative staging of rectal cancer, providing adequate information for clinical decision- making in many cases. However, with the currently available ultrasonographic equipment and techniques, a good deal of relevant information may remain hidden. The advent of high-resolution three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasound, constructed from a synthesis of standard two-dimensional cross-sectional images, and of "Volume Render Mode," a technique to analyze information inside a threedimensional volume, promises to improve the accuracy of rectal cancer staging. The anatomic structures in the pelvis, the axial and longitudinal extension of the tumor, the presence of slight or massive submucosal invasion in early rectal cancer may be imaged in greater detail. This additional information will bring an improvement for both planning and conduct of surgical procedures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Iannicelli ◽  
Sara Di Renzo ◽  
Mario Ferri ◽  
Emanuela Pilozzi ◽  
Marco Di Girolamo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David D.B. Bates ◽  
Maria El Homsi ◽  
Kevin Chang ◽  
Neeraj Lalwani ◽  
Natally Horvat ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. Detering ◽  
S. E. van Oostendorp ◽  
V. M. Meyer ◽  
S. van Dieren ◽  
A. C. R. K. Bos ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB439
Author(s):  
Ferga C. Gleeson ◽  
Michael J. Levy ◽  
Joel G. Fletcher ◽  
Sawra Maurer ◽  
Sheila Buehler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document