scholarly journals Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1794-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Maas ◽  
Surya Biere ◽  
Donald Van der Peet ◽  
Miguel Cuesta
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Oshikiri ◽  
Gosuke Takiguchi ◽  
Susumu Miura ◽  
Nobuhisa Takase ◽  
Hiroshi Hasegawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis ◽  
Dimitrios Schizas ◽  
Theodore Liakakos ◽  
Richard van Hillegersberg

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was introduced in the 1990s with the aim to decrease the rate of respiratory complications associated with thoracotomy, along with the benefits of reduced morbidity and a quicker return to normal activities provided by minimally invasive techniques. However, MIE is not routinely applied as a standard approach for esophageal cancer worldwide, due to the high technical complexity of this minimally invasive procedure. Therefore, the open transthoracic esophagectomy is considered to be the gold standard for resectable esophageal cancer worldwide nowadays. In this article, the current status of conventional MIE and robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be reviewed.


Surgery Today ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Kanamori ◽  
Masayuki Watanabe ◽  
Suguru Maruyama ◽  
Yasukazu Kanie ◽  
Daisuke Fujiwara ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yassin Eddahchouri ◽  
◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document