Are Incidental Minute Pulmonary Nodules Ultimately Determined to Be Metastatic Nodules in Esophageal Cancer Patients?

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Esophageal cancer patients may simultaneously have resectable esophageal cancer and undiagnosable incidental minute solid pulmonary nodules. While the latter is rarely metastatic, only a few studies have reported on the outcomes of such nodules after surgery. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of such nodules, the probability that they are ultimately metastatic nodules, and the prognosis of patients after esophagectomy according to the metastatic status of the nodules. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data of 398 patients who underwent esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected. We reviewed computed tomography (CT) images from the first visit and searched for incidental minute pulmonary nodules &#x3c;10 mm in size. We followed the outcomes of these nodules and compared the characteristics of metastatic and nonmetastatic nodules. We also assessed the prognosis of patients whose minute pulmonary nodules were metastatic. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the patients who underwent esophagectomy, 149 (37.4%) had one or more minute pulmonary nodules, with a total of 285 nodules. Thirteen (4.6%) of these nodules in 12 (8.1%) patients were ultimately diagnosed as being metastatic. Thirteen (8.7%) patients experienced recurrence at a different location from where the nodules were originally identified. Characteristics of the metastatic nodules were not unique in terms of size, SUVmax, or location in the lungs. Two-year and 5-year overall survival rates of patients whose nodules were metastatic were 64.2 and 32.1%, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The rate of minute pulmonary nodules which were ultimately metastatic was 4.6%. Our findings suggest that esophagectomy followed by the identification of minute pulmonary nodules is an acceptable strategy even if the nodules cannot be diagnosed as being metastatic on the first visit CT due to their small size.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: A protocol of meta-analysis

Background Esophageal cancer is a highly malignant cancer with a very poor prognosis. For resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant treatment could improve the prognosis of esophageal cancer. However, current clinical neoadjuvant treatment options for esophageal cancer are still limited. The application of immunotherapy is a potentially beneficial new neoadjuvant treatment option for esophageal cancer. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods We will search Wanfang Database, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Embase, Web of Science, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles published before July, 2021. We will also search the unpublished clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in esophageal cancer in preprint website (such as bioRXiv and medRxiv) up to July, 2021. We will perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be included in this study. The risk of bias will be evaluated for each included study using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We will use RevMan 5.3 software for statistical analysis of the data. Results The results of this study will provide evidence of immunotherapy using as neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer. This meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal seeking for publication. Conclusion The results of this study will provide a reliable basis for clinicians and patients to formulate the best pre-surgical treatment plan for resectable esophageal cancer. Systematic review registration INPLASY202120026.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis by low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma (rEAC) patients.

4033 Background: ctDNA is becoming an established marker to assess tumor burden, relapse after surgery, and to identify responders in immunotherapy studies. In the phase II PERFECT trial rEAC patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and a PD-L1 inhibitor (van den Ende et al. CCR. 2021). Here we evaluated the potential of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to predict pathological complete response (pCR) and recurrence. Methods: The cohort consisted of 40 patients and 145 plasma samples. EDTA blood samples were drawn at baseline (B, N = 40), in week 5 of nCRT (W5, N = 40), before surgery (OR, N = 33) and 3 months after surgery (FU, N = 32). cfDNA was isolated by affinity columns (CNAkit, QIAgen) quantified by spectrofluorometer (BioAnalyzer, Agilent), sequencing libraries were prepared for lcWGS ( < 5-fold coverage, Tag-seq, Takara) and sequenced on a NovaSeq (S4, PE150). Sequencing data were processed with an in-house pipeline. Copy number aberrations (CNA) and the tumor fraction were estimated using the ichorCNA tool. Insert sizes were recovered and we determined a Tumor Enriched Fragment Fraction (TEFF), calculated by doing the ratio of fragments between 90-150 bp and 250-320 bp (enriched in tumor signal) and fragments between 150-250 bp and 320-360 bp (poor in tumor signal). ichorCNA and TEFF were used to quantify the ctDNA fraction in plasma samples. pCR was defined as ypT0N0. Residual tumor, progression or death before surgery were considered non-pCR. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time after surgery until recurrence. Results: The pCR rate was 25% (10/40). The median fold change TEFF between B and W5 was -0.15 (range -0.67 to 0.44) in the pCR group and 0.16 (range -1.40 to 0.76) in the non-pCR group (Mann–Whitney U; p = 0.047). Of the 17 patients in whom ctDNA was detected (TEFF≥0.3 and/or ichorCNA≥0.03) in the FU sample, 13 (76%) showed a recurrence. Of the 15 patients with no ctDNA detected 5 (33%) showed a recurrence. Patients with ctDNA detected at FU had worse RFS, HR = 2.72 (95%CI 0.96-7.71; p = 0.050). Recurrences were detected earlier by FU ctDNA than by imaging due to physical complaints with a median of 312 days (163-798 days). Conclusions: lcWGS appears to be a useful tool to predict pCR and recurrence in resectable esophageal cancer. These lcWGS results will be further combined with fragmentomics analysis and targeted mutational data (Ion Torrent next-generation sequencing) in order to assess response to immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03087864.

A phase II study of chemoselection with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5–fluorouracil as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with resectable esophageal cancer (CROC trial).

4027 Background: In patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), the outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for good responders after three courses of induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5–fluorouracil (DCF chemotherapy) were unclear. Methods: Patients with clinical stage IB–III (UICC 7th) resectable esophageal SCC were eligible. IC included docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5–fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1–5, repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. The response was evaluated after 2 and 3 courses of IC. Patients were considered to have a “remarkable response (RR)” if an endoscopic examination with a central review showed shrinking of the primary lesion equivalent to T1 and the short axis of the metastatic lymph nodes were all < 1 cm on computed tomography—in other words, down staging to T1N0M0 stage IA. Patients were considered to have a “poor response (POR)” if they had progressive disease or no signs of reduction. Patients who did not achieve RR or POR were deemed to have “limited partial response (LPR)”. CRT was administered to patients who achieved RR, and surgery was performed in patients who achieved LPR or POR. CRT included cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5–fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on days 1–4, repeated every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Radiotherapy was administered as 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was a 1–year progression free survival (PFS) for RR followed by CRT. Results: A total of 92 patients were enrolled. Two patients with non–SCC (n = 1) and distant metastasis (n = 1) were excluded. Therefore, 90 patients were included in the analysis group. Although 1 patient could not continue IC due to renal failure, the remaining 89 patients completed 3 courses of IC. The response after IC were RR in 58.4% (52/89), LPR in 41.6% (37/89), and POR in 0.0% (0/89). Three patients who achieved RR underwent surgery owing to renal dysfunction (n = 1), curative irradiation difficulty due to intestinal malrotation (n = 1), and CRT refusal (n = 1). Six patients who achieved LPR underwent CRT owing to surgery refusal (n = 3), unresectable tumors (n = 2), and respiratory dysfunction due to emphysema (n = 1). The complete response rate for RR followed by CRT was 89.8%. During the median follow–up period of 33 months (range: 1–85), the 1 and 3–years overall survival (OS) for the analysis group were 96.6% and 74.1%, respectively. The 1 and 3–years organ preservation survival for the analysis group were 56.8% and 45.3%, respectively. The 1 and 3–years OS for RR followed by CRT (n = 49) vs. LPR followed by surgery (n = 31) were 100% vs. 93.1% and 83.7% vs. 62.8%, respectively (p = 0.06). The 1 and 3–years PFS for RR followed by CRT were 89.8% and 70.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Three courses of DCF chemotherapy followed by CRT is an effective treatment for patients with resectable esophageal SCC who respond to the IC regimen. Clinical trial information: 8086.