Perioperative factors associated with pain following open ventral hernia repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 4102-4108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walker Ueland ◽  
Margaret A. Plymale ◽  
Daniel L. Davenport ◽  
John Scott Roth
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Prevention of Subcutaneous Seroma Formation in Open Ventral Hernia Repair Using a New Low-Thrombin Fibrin Sealant

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2797-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gernot Köhler ◽  
Oliver Owen Koch ◽  
Stavros A. Antoniou ◽  
Michael Lechner ◽  
Franz Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Fibrin Sealant ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Seroma Formation ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Causes of readmission after laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair: Identifying failed discharges and opportunities for action

Surgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Celio ◽  
Kevin R. Kasten ◽  
Walter E. Pofahl ◽  
Walter J. Pories ◽  
Konstantinos Spaniolas
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 465
Author(s):  
Magdy Basheer ◽  
Ahmed Negm ◽  
Hosam El-Ghadban ◽  
Mohamed Samir ◽  
Amro Hadidy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

An Evaluation of Fascial Closure Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Practice Patterns and Short-Term Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1213-1218
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Fox ◽  
Li-Ching Huang ◽  
W. Borden Hooks ◽  
John P. Fischer ◽  
William W. Hope
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Interrupted Suture ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

The best method for fascial closure during hernia repair remains unknown. This study evaluates the impact of fascial closure techniques on short-term outcomes. All patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair were queried using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database. Analysis was stratified by suture type (absorbable and permanent) and technique (figure-of-eight, running, and interrupted). Outcome measures included SSI, surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention, recurrence rate, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. The study included 6544 patients. Two-thirds of surgeons closed fascia during ventral hernia repair with absorbable suture and one-third with permanent suture. In the absorbable group, 17 per cent used figure-of-eight, 46 per cent running, and 4 per cent interrupted suture. In the permanent group, 13 per cent used figure-of-eight, 8 per cent running, and 11 per cent interrupted suture. There was no significant association between SSO and closure technique ( P = 0.2). However, SSO and suture type were significant ( P < 0.001) with the odds of SSO for closure with absorbable suture being 62 per cent higher than the odds of permanent. Fascial closure technique and suture type had no significant association ( P > 0.5) with SSI, SSO requiring intervention, hernia recurrence rate, or HerQLes or NIH PROMIS 3a scores at 30 days or 6 months. Fascial closure technique and suture material do not have a major impact on outcomes in ventral hernia repair. Despite a significantly higher rate of SSO for absorbable sutures than permanent, this did not increase the rate of interventions.

scholarly journals Open ventral hernia repair with a composite ventral patch - final results of a multicenter prospective study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Berrevoet ◽  
C. Doerhoff ◽  
F. Muysoms ◽  
S. Hopson ◽  
M. G. Muzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Study

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 769-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Yi Juo ◽  
Matthew Skancke ◽  
Jeremy Holzmacher ◽  
Richard L. Amdur ◽  
Paul P. Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

National Outcomes for Open Ventral Hernia Repair Techniques in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
Bindhu Oommen ◽  
Ciara Huntington ◽  
Amanda L. Walters ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Modern adjuncts to complex, open ventral hernia repair often include component separation (CS) and/or panniculectomy (PAN). This study examines nationwide data to determine how these techniques impact postoperative complications. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005 to 2013 for inpatient, elective open ventral hernia repairs (OVHR). Cases were grouped by the need for and type of concomitant advancement flaps: OVHR alone (OVHRA), OVHR with CS, OVHR with panniculectomy (PAN), or both CS and PAN (BOTH). Multivariate regression to control for confounding factors was conducted. There were 58,845 OVHR: 51,494 OVHRA, 5,357 CS, 1,617 PAN, and 377 BOTH. Wound complications (OVHRA 8.2%, CS 12.8%, PAN 14.4%, BOTH 17.5%), general complications (15.2%, 24.9%, 25.2%, 31.6%), and major complications (6.9%, 11.4%, 7.2%, 13.5%) were different between groups ( P < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality. Multivariate regression showed CS had higher odds of wound [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–2.0], general (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3–1.8), and major complications (OR 2.1, 95%, CI: 1.8–2.4), and longer length of stay by 2.3 days. PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 1.5, 95%, CI: 1.3–1.8) and general complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5–2.0). Both CS and PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 2.2,95%, CI: 1.5–3.2), general (OR 2.5, 95%, CI: 1.8–3.4), and major complications (OR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.4–3.4), and two days longer length of stay. In conclusion, patients undergoing OVHR that require CS or PAN have a higher independent risk of complications, which increases when the procedures are combined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document