scholarly journals Explicit mixed strain-displacement finite element for dynamic geometrically non-linear solid mechanics

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 543-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Lafontaine ◽  
R. Rossi ◽  
M. Cervera ◽  
M. Chiumenti
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Non Linear

Edge-based finite element techniques for non-linear solid mechanics problems

2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 2053-2068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro L. G. A. Coutinho ◽  
Marcos A. D. Martins ◽  
Jos� L. D. Alves ◽  
Luiz Landau ◽  
Anderson Moraes
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Solid Mechanics ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Edge Based

First and Second Order Elastoplastic Analyses of Thin-Walled Metal Members using Generalized Beam Theory

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Abambres
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Beam Theory ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Flow Rule ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Thin Walled ◽  
Shell Finite Element ◽  
Generalized Beam Theory

Original Generalized Beam Theory (GBT) formulations for elastoplastic first and second order (postbuckling) analyses of thin-walled members are proposed, based on the J2 theory with associated flow rule, and valid for (i) arbitrary residual stress and geometric imperfection distributions, (ii) non-linear isotropic materials (e.g., carbon/stainless steel), and (iii) arbitrary deformation patterns (e.g., global, local, distortional, shear). The cross-section analysis is based on the formulation by Silva (2013), but adopts five types of nodal degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) – one of them (warping rotation) is an innovation of present work and allows the use of cubic polynomials (instead of linear functions) to approximate the warping profiles in each sub-plate. The formulations are validated by presenting various illustrative examples involving beams and columns characterized by several cross-section types (open, closed, (un) branched), materials (bi-linear or non-linear – e.g., stainless steel) and boundary conditions. The GBT results (equilibrium paths, stress/displacement distributions and collapse mechanisms) are validated by comparison with those obtained from shell finite element analyses. It is observed that the results are globally very similar with only 9% and 21% (1st and 2nd order) of the d.o.f. numbers required by the shell finite element models. Moreover, the GBT unique modal nature is highlighted by means of modal participation diagrams and amplitude functions, as well as analyses based on different deformation mode sets, providing an in-depth insight on the member behavioural mechanics in both elastic and inelastic regimes.

Behaviour of Axially Loaded Composite Wall Panel by Using Finite Element Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 815 ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Nur Fitriah Isa ◽  
Mohd Zulham Affandi Mohd Zahid ◽  
Liyana Ahmad Sofri ◽  
Norrazman Zaiha Zainol ◽  
Muhammad Azizi Azizan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Composite Structures ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Steel Sheets ◽  
Linear Behavior ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Composite Wall ◽  
Experimental Values ◽  
Civil Engineering Infrastructure

In order to promote the efficient use of composite materials in civil engineering infrastructure, effort is being directed at the development of design criteria for composite structures. Insofar as design with regard to behavior is concerned, it is well known that a key step is to investigate the influence of geometric differences on the non-linear behavior of the panels. One possible approach is to use the validated numerical model based on the non-linear finite element analysis (FEA). The validation of the composite panel’s element using Trim-deck and Span-deck steel sheets under axial load shows that the present results have very good agreement with experimental references. The developed finite element (FE) models are found to reasonably simulate load-displacement response, stress condition, giving percentage of differences below than 15% compared to the experimental values. Trim-deck design provides better axial resistance than Span-deck. More concrete in between due to larger area of contact is the factor that contributes to its resistance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document