Touch, Caring, and Cancer: randomized controlled trial of a multimedia caregiver education program

Abstract Background Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is a cranial deformation frequent amongst children and consisting in a flattened and asymmetrical head shape. PP is associated with excessive time in supine and with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). Few studies have evaluated the efficiency of a manual therapy approach in PP. The purpose of this parallel randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of adding a manual therapy approach to a caregiver education program focusing on active rotation range of motion (AROM) and neuromotor development in a PP pediatric sample. Methods Thirty-four children with PP and less than 28 week-old were randomly distributed into two groups. AROM and neuromotor development with Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) were measured. The evaluation was performed by an examiner, blinded to the randomization of the subjects. A pediatric integrative manual therapy (PIMT) group received 10-sessions involving manual therapy and a caregiver education program. Manual therapy was addressed to the upper cervical spine to mobilize the occiput, atlas and axis. The caregiver educational program consisted in exercises to reduce the positional preference and to stimulate motor development. The control group received the caregiver education program exclusively. To compare intervention effectiveness across the groups, improvement indexes of AROM and AIMS were calculated using the difference of the final measurement values minus the baseline measurement values. If the distribution was normal, the improvement indexes were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples; if not, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. The effect size of the interventions was calculated using Cohen’s d. Results All randomized subjects were analysed. After the intervention, the PIMT group showed a significantly higher increase in rotation (29.68 ± 18.41°) than the control group (6.13 ± 17.69°) (p = 0.001). Both groups improved the neuromotor development but no statistically significant differences were found. No harm was reported during the study. Conclusion The PIMT intervention program was more effective in increasing AROM than using only a caregiver education program. The study has been retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov, with identification number NCT03659032. Registration date: September 1, 2018.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Pediatric Integrative Manual Therapy In Cervical Movement Limitation In Infants With Positional Plagiocephaly: A Randomized Controlled Trial

10.21203/rs.3.rs-122219/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Iñaki Pastor-Pons ◽

Cesar Hidalgo García ◽

María Orosia Lucha-López ◽

Marta Barrau-Lalmolda ◽

Iñaki Rodes-Pastor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Manual Therapy ◽

Education Program ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Control Group ◽

Positional Plagiocephaly ◽

Therapy Approach ◽

Caregiver Education ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Neuromotor Development

Abstract Background: Positional plagiocephaly (PP) is a cranial deformation frequent amongst children and consisting in a flattened and asymmetrical head shape. PP is associated with excessive time in supine and with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). Few studies have evaluated the efficiency of a manual therapy approach in PP. The purpose of this parallel randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of adding a manual therapy approach to a caregiver education program focusing on active rotation range of motion (AROM) and neuromotor development in a PP pediatric sample. Methods: 34 children with PP and less than 28 week old were randomly distributed into two groups. AROM and neuromotor development with Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) were measured. The evaluation was performed by an examiner, blinded to the randomization of the subjects. A pediatric integrative manual therapy (PIMT) group received 10-sessions involving manual therapy and a caregiver education program. The control group received the caregiver education program exclusively. To compare intervention effectiveness across the groups, improvement indexes of AROM and AIMS were calculated using the difference of the final measurement values minus the baseline measurement values. If the distribution was normal, the improvement indexes were compared using the Student t-test for independent samples; if not, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. The effect size of the interventions was calculated using Cohen's d. Results: All randomized subject were analysed. After the intervention, the PIMT group showed a significantly higher increase in rotation (29.68 ± 18.41º) than the control group (6.13 ± 17.69º) (p< 0.05). Both groups improved the neuromotor development but no statistical significant differences were found. No harm was reported during the study.Conclusion: The PIMT intervention program was more effective in increasing AROM than using only a caregiver education program.

Download Full-text