Sternum-splitting anterior approach following posterior decompression and fusion in patients with massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the upper thoracic spine: report of 2 cases and literature review

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (S3) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi ◽  
Shoji Seki ◽  
Yasuhito Yahara ◽  
Takahiro Homma ◽  
Tomoatsu Kimura
2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred C. Lam ◽  
Michael W. Groff

Surgical pathology in the region of the upper thoracic spine (T1–4) is uncommon compared with other regions of the spine. Often times posterior and posterolateral approaches can be used, but formal anterior decompression often requires a low anterior cervical approach combined with a sternotomy, which yields significant perioperative morbidity. The authors describe a modified low anterior cervical dissection combined with a partial manubriotomy that they have used to successfully access and decompress anterior pathology of the upper thoracic spine. Their modified approach spares the sternoclavicular joints and leaves the sternum intact, decreasing the morbidity associated with these added procedures.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutsuhiro Tamura ◽  
Masashi Saito ◽  
Masafumi Machida ◽  
Keiichi Shibasaki

✓ The anterior approach is commonly used to reach the upper thoracic region to achieve decompression and stabilization; however, upper thoracic lesions are difficult to treat because of the regional anatomical structures, and this approach is associated with risks of complication. The authors evaluated the advantages of using a transsternoclavicular approach to aid in treating upper thoracic lesions. The procedure and surgery-related outcomes are discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-517
Author(s):  
Shogo Tahata ◽  
Koji Akasaki ◽  
Taka-aki Sagara ◽  
Yosuke Kawatani ◽  
Hiroyuki Watanabe ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Rivkin ◽  
Jessica F. Okun ◽  
Steven S. Yocom

ABSTRACT Summary of Background Data: Multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions are becoming more prevalent in current practice. Biomechanical characteristics of the cervicothoracic junction may necessitate extending the construct to upper thoracic segments. However, fixation in upper thoracic spine can be technically demanding owing to transitional anatomy while suboptimal placement facilitates vascular and neurologic complications. Thoracic instrumentation methods include free-hand, fluoroscopic guidance, and CT-based image guidance. However, fluoroscopy of upper thoracic spine is challenging secondary to vertebral geometry and patient positioning, while image-guided systems present substantial financial commitment and are not readily available at most centers. Additionally, imaging modalities increase radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon while potentially lengthening surgical time. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients undergoing a cervicothoracic fusion by a single surgeon using the novel free-hand T1 pedicle screw technique between June 2009 and November 2012. A starting point medial and cephalad to classic entry as well as new trajectory were utilized. No imaging modalities were employed during screw insertion. Postoperative CT scans were obtained on day 1. Screw accuracy was independently evaluated according to the Heary classification. Results: In total, 87 pedicle screws placed were at T1. Grade 1 placement occurred in 72 (82.8%) screws, Grade 2 in 4 (4.6%) screws and Grade 3 in 9 (10.3%) screws. All Grade 2 and 3 breaches were <2 mm except one Grade 3 screw breaching 2-4 mm laterally. Only two screws (2.3%) were noted to be Grade 4, both breaching medially by less than 2 mm. No new neurological deficits or returns to operating room took place postoperatively. Conclusions: This modification of the traditional starting point and trajectory at T1 is safe and effective. It attenuates additional bone removal or imaging modalities while maintaining a high rate of successful screw placement compared to historical controls.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document