scholarly journals The Global Spine Care Initiative: care pathway for people with spine-related concerns

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (S6) ◽  
pp. 901-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Haldeman ◽  
Claire D. Johnson ◽  
Roger Chou ◽  
Margareta Nordin ◽  
Pierre Côté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Paskowski ◽  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Joel Stevans ◽  
John M. Ventura ◽  
Brian D. Justice

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36S-40S
Author(s):  
George M. Ghobrial ◽  
Jefferson Wilson ◽  
Daniel Franco ◽  
Kristen Vogl ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: To describe the early implementation of an inpatient spinal surgery unit and measure the impact on cost and length of stay (LOS). Methods: A retrospective case review was performed for frequent spine-related diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) cared for by a dedicated multidisciplinary team: combined anterior/posterior (AP) spinal fusion with major complicating or comorbid condition (MCC), combined (AP) spinal fusion with CC, combined (AP) spinal fusion without complicating or comorbid (CC)/MCC, cervical spinal fusion with MCC, cervical spinal fusion with CC, and cervical spinal fusion without CC/MCC. Four time periods were compared: historical control, initial pathway implementation, full pathway implementation, and spine unit opening. Mean hospital LOS, mean and median total costs (USD), and ratio of costs-to-charges were analyzed. Results: The number of spine cases per interim ranged from 219 to 258. The mean overall hospital LOS and mean cost varied from 3.8 to 4.3 days for all DRGs across the time periods and was not significant. Cost also did not vary significantly throughout. Median variable cost per anterior/posterior spinal fusion procedure with a CC or MCC declined by 16 311, first with the institution of a spine pathway protocol by USD8738 and then USD7423 with the establishment of a spine care unit but did not reach significance. Conclusions: The use of a standardized, inpatient spine care pathway implemented by a multidisciplinary team may reduce the hospital length of stay and decrease overall costs.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Khonji ◽  
Naveed Khan ◽  
Kevin McEwan ◽  
Kishani Wijewarden ◽  
Alok Gupta

Author(s):  
C. J. Koppel ◽  
B. W. Driesen ◽  
R. J. de Winter ◽  
A. E. van den Bosch ◽  
R. van Kimmenade ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current guidelines on coronary anomalies are primarily based on expert consensus and a limited number of trials. A gold standard for diagnosis and a consensus on the treatment strategy in this patient group are lacking, especially for patients with an anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) with an interarterial course. Aim To provide evidence-substantiated recommendations for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up of patients with anomalous coronary arteries. Methods A clinical care pathway for patients with ACAOS was established by six Dutch centres. Prospectively included patients undergo work-up according to protocol using computed tomography (CT) angiography, ischaemia detection, echocardiography and coronary angiography with intracoronary measurements to assess anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ACAOS. Surgical and functional follow-up results are evaluated by CT angiography, ischaemia detection and a quality-of-life questionnaire. Patient inclusion for the first multicentre study on coronary anomalies in the Netherlands started in 2020 and will continue for at least 3 years with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. For patients with a right or left coronary artery originating from the pulmonary artery and coronary arteriovenous fistulas a registry is maintained. Results Primary outcomes are: (cardiac) death, myocardial ischaemia attributable to the ACAOS, re-intervention after surgery and intervention after initially conservative treatment. The influence of work-up examinations on treatment choice is also evaluated. Conclusions Structural evidence for the appropriate management of patients with coronary anomalies, especially (interarterial) ACAOS, is lacking. By means of a structured care pathway in a multicentre setting, we aim to provide an evidence-based strategy for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of this patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document