A Hospital-Based Standardized Spine Care Pathway: Report of a Multidisciplinary, Evidence-Based Process

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Paskowski ◽  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Joel Stevans ◽  
John M. Ventura ◽  
Brian D. Justice
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (S6) ◽  
pp. 901-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Haldeman ◽  
Claire D. Johnson ◽  
Roger Chou ◽  
Margareta Nordin ◽  
Pierre Côté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengchen Yin ◽  
Yinjie Yan ◽  
Zhaoxiang Fan ◽  
Niankang Fang ◽  
Hongbo Wan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) is increasing with the rapid increase in the aging population, often causes a high mortality rate in old patients and increases the economic burden of the family and society. ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) is a powerful guarantee for patients to accelerate their recovery after surgery. TCM (traditional Chinese medicine) promote repair of injured tissues and eliminate traumatic aseptic inflammation. Therefore, this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical effect of the evidence-based ERAS pathway of integrating TCM with and western medicine on perioperative outcomes in ITF patients undergoing intramedullary fixation, and provide reliable evidence-based data for applying the program to clinical practice. Methods/design: We will conduct a prospective randomized, blinded, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of ERAS care pathway with traditional care pathway, and to investigate whether the ERAS care pathway can improve the perioperative outcome in ITF patients undergoing intramedullary fixation. A total of 60 patients with ITF will be enrolled and treated with the two care pathway, respectively. Length of stay, economic indicators, Harris score, VAS score, time get out of bed, 30-day readmission rates, postoperative transfusion rates, discharge to home and mortality will be evaluated. Any signs of acute adverse reactions will be recorded at each visit during treatment. Discussion: Although an evidence-based process using the best available literature and Delphi expert-opinion method has been used to establish an ERAS pathway of integrating TCM with western medicine. But, there is a lack of consensus about its effectiveness. This trial will provide convincing evidence about the effect of ERAS pathway Trial registration: Registered on 12 Oct 2019; Trial number is ChiCTR190t0026487 Keywords: intertrochanteric fracture; enhanced recovery after surgery; perioperative period; integrating TCM with and western medicine; randomized controlled trial


Spine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Bradywood ◽  
Farrokh Farrokhi ◽  
Barbara Williams ◽  
Mark Kowalczyk ◽  
C. Craig Blackmore

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Seys ◽  
M Panella ◽  
R VanZelm ◽  
W Sermeus ◽  
D Aeyels ◽  
...  

Care pathway implementation is characterised by a dual complexity. A care pathway itself represents a complex intervention with multiple interacting and interdependent intervention components and outcomes. The organisations in which care pathways are being implemented represent complex systems that need to be directed at change through an in-depth understanding of their external and internal context in which they are functioning in. This study sets out a new evidence-based and pragmatic framework that unpacks how intervention mechanisms, intervention fidelity and care context are converge and represent interacting processes that determine success or failure of the care pathway. We recommend researchers looking to increase the effectiveness of care pathway implementation and accelerate improvement of desired outcomes to adopt this framework from inception to implementation of the intervention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36S-40S
Author(s):  
George M. Ghobrial ◽  
Jefferson Wilson ◽  
Daniel Franco ◽  
Kristen Vogl ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: To describe the early implementation of an inpatient spinal surgery unit and measure the impact on cost and length of stay (LOS). Methods: A retrospective case review was performed for frequent spine-related diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) cared for by a dedicated multidisciplinary team: combined anterior/posterior (AP) spinal fusion with major complicating or comorbid condition (MCC), combined (AP) spinal fusion with CC, combined (AP) spinal fusion without complicating or comorbid (CC)/MCC, cervical spinal fusion with MCC, cervical spinal fusion with CC, and cervical spinal fusion without CC/MCC. Four time periods were compared: historical control, initial pathway implementation, full pathway implementation, and spine unit opening. Mean hospital LOS, mean and median total costs (USD), and ratio of costs-to-charges were analyzed. Results: The number of spine cases per interim ranged from 219 to 258. The mean overall hospital LOS and mean cost varied from 3.8 to 4.3 days for all DRGs across the time periods and was not significant. Cost also did not vary significantly throughout. Median variable cost per anterior/posterior spinal fusion procedure with a CC or MCC declined by 16 311, first with the institution of a spine pathway protocol by USD8738 and then USD7423 with the establishment of a spine care unit but did not reach significance. Conclusions: The use of a standardized, inpatient spine care pathway implemented by a multidisciplinary team may reduce the hospital length of stay and decrease overall costs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 780-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Yarbrough ◽  
Polina V. Kukhareva ◽  
Emily Sydnor Spivak ◽  
Christy Hopkins ◽  
Kensaku Kawamoto

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Haldeman ◽  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Ralph Gay ◽  
Jean Moss ◽  
Joan Haldeman ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly limited the access of patients to care for spine-related symptoms and disorders. However, physical distancing between clinicians and patients with spine-related symptoms is not solely limited to restrictions imposed by pandemic lockdown. In most low- and middle-income countries, as well as many underserved marginalized communities in high income countries there is little to no access to clinicians trained in evidence-based care for people experiencing spinal pain. OBJECTIVE To describe the development and present the components of evidence-based patient and clinician guides for the management of spinal disorders where in-person care is not available. METHODS One set of guides for patients and one for clinicians were developed by extracting information from the published Global Spine Care Initiative (GSCI) papers. An international, interprofessional team of 29 participants from 10 countries on four continents participated. They included practitioners in family medicine, neurology, physiatry, rheumatology, psychology, chiropractic, physical therapy, and yoga as well as epidemiologists, research methodologists, and lay stakeholders. The participants were invited to review, edit, and comment on the guides in an open iterative consensus process. RESULTS The Patient Guide is a simple 2-step process. The first step describes the nature of the symptoms or concerns. The second step provides information that a patient can use when considering self-care; when to contact a clinician, or when to seek emergency care. The Clinician Guide is a 5-step process. 1. Obtain and document patient demographics, location of primary clinical symptoms and psychosocial information. 2. Review the symptoms noted in the patient guide. 3. Determine of the GSCI classification of the patient’s spine related complaints. 4. Ask additional questions to determine the GSCI subclassification of the symptom pattern. 5. Consider appropriate treatment interventions. CONCLUSIONS The Patient and Clinician Guides are designed to be sufficiently clear to be useful to all patients and clinicians irrespective of their location, education, professional qualifications, and experience. However, they are comprehensive enough to provide guidance on the management of all spine related symptoms or disorders including triage for serious and specific diseases. They are consistent with widely accepted evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. They also allow for adequate documentation and medical record keeping. These guides should be of value during periods of government mandated physical or social distancing due to infections such as the COVID pandemic. They should also be of value in underserved communities in high, middle, and low-income countries where there is a dearth of accessible trained spine care clinicians, These guides have the potential to reduce the overutilization of unnecessary and expensive interventions while empowering patients to self-manage uncomplicated spinal pain with the assistance of their clinician, either through direct in-person consultation or via telehealth communication.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vida Dossou ◽  
Ally Cleary

Abstract Background Following a recent merger or UGI Cancer services, a consensus was needed for the ERAS pathway nutritional elements. ERAS is a way to maintain physiological function following surgery enabling post-operative recovery without adversely affecting morbidity or mortality.  It is a coordinated pathway that enables consistent, evidence based multi-modal care. Anaesthesia, nutrition, analgesia, surgical technique and physiotherapy are active and key components of enhanced recovery along with patient involvement and empowerment.  ERAS in UGI revealed a significant reduction in LOS in most cases, by around 50% without increasing morbidity and mortality when compared to standard post-operative care.  Methods Coupling the service redesign with the publication of guidelines in ERAS and Gastrectomy, it was decided to review the evidence base for ERAS and nutrition support specific to UGI Cancer surgery.  In addition to this, aim to review the evidence for and against the use of immunonutrition (IN).  Literature searches were conducted using CINAHL and PUBMED databases. The evidence was critiqued and a consensus reached. From this evidence review, an algorithm recommending the instigation of nutrition post Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) surgery as part of an ERAS pathway was developed.  Results An algorithm was produced standardising the nutritional care for patients undergoing elective UGI surgery in our centre, which formed part of the ERAS care pathway produced through the ERAS steering group. All patients were screened for risk of malnutrition at the start of their surgical care pathway and regularly throughout their journey, appropriate nutritional support will be provided by a specialist Dietitian to optimise the patient.   Conclusions The evidence to support the use of IN is conflicting and is not currently recommended on this ERAS pathway. Nutritional intake in the form of Oral Nutritional Support (ONS) in subtotal gastrectomy can be commenced at Day 2. Nutritional intake in the form of ONS in Total Gastrectomy can be commenced at Day 4. Nutritional intake in the form of ONS in Oesophagogastrectomy can be commenced at Day 5. After ONS tolerated without clinical symptoms, patient can be progressed to Soups, Jellies, Ice creams for 24 hours then to an UGI specific soft menu pre discharge.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document