Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Surgical site infections (SSI) following lumbar spinal fusion procedures are associated with extended hospital stays, increased complications, and lower patient outcome satisfaction. Additionally, hospitals can face stiff financial penalties from CMS for increased rates of SSI. Modern minimally invasive approaches for anterior interbody fusion (XLIF) were developed to minimize approach-related morbidity compared to direct anterior and conventional posterior approaches, the latter of which are associated with infection rates from 2.7% to as high as 10.9%. The aim of this study is to evaluate infection rates following XLIF in those patient with and without supplemental internal fixation.
METHODS
A total of 994 patients treated with XLIF from T12-L1 to L5-S1 (619 with supplemental internal fixation, 375 standalone) were evaluated and included in the analysis. On average, patients were treated at fewer levels in the standalone versus fixated group (mean 1.7 versus 2.1 levels).
RESULTS
>A total of nine (9) surgical site infections were reported in 994 XLIF patients (0.9%), with no significant differences between standalone and fixation (0.8% and 1% respectively, P = 1.00). The standalone group had two superficial infections, which only extended the post-operative length of stay. The supplemental fixation group had two infections from posterior instrumentation and three superficial infections, all of which only required longer hospitalization. Additionally, there were two deep wound infections, one in each cohort, that required I&D. No patients suffered long-term consequences.
CONCLUSION
Infections following XLIF were rare (<1%) in a relatively large, multi-centric experience and did not vary with use of supplemental fixation. Compared to previously reported outcomes in the anterior and posterior approach, XLIF is associated with decreased rates of infection, thereby reducing harm to the patient and cost to the hospital.