Surface pressure measurements on a generic submarine hull form at high angles of incidence

Author(s):  
Md. Kareem Khan ◽  
Manu Korulla ◽  
Vishwanath Nagarajan ◽  
Om Prakash Sha
1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-172
Author(s):  
Yeol Lee ◽  
Sanjay Garg ◽  
Gary S. Settles

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 729-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Bertagnolio ◽  
Helge Aa. Madsen ◽  
Christian Bak ◽  
Niels Troldborg ◽  
Andreas Fischer

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 1160-1167
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhou ◽  
Jian Xiong ◽  
Liusheng Chen ◽  
Husheng Ma ◽  
Yang Tao

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Downie ◽  
Joel Le Calvez ◽  
Barry Dean ◽  
Jeff Rutledge

Abstract Interpretation of the microseismic data acquired during hydraulic fracture treatments is based on a variety of techniques that make use of the locations, times, and source parameters of the detected events, in conjunction with the stimulation treatment data. It is sometimes possible to observe trends or changes in the microseismic data that correspond to the surface pressure measurements; however this aspect of interpretation becomes problematic due the variability of fluid friction, slurry density, perforation restrictions, and other near-wellbore pressures when computing bottom hole fracturing pressure. An interpretation technique is proposed that uses pressure measurements in observation wells that are offset to the treatment well during microseismic interpretations. The observation well can be any well with open perforations in close proximity to the treatment well. The observation well pressures are not affected by the many complicating factors that are encountered when estimating pressure in the fracture from the surface pressure measured in the treatment well. Example data from field observations are used to demonstrate that the detection of microseismic events near an observation well and corresponding detection of fluid pressure from the fracture in the observation well validates the calculated event locations. The relationship between fracture pressure, the state of stress, and microseismic responses is discussed using Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria. Observation-well pressures and microseismic events are also used to identify instances where reservoir pressure depletion near the observation well affects surface operations at the treatment well. The results of the study show that reliable measurements of fracture pressure for use in microseismic interpretations can be obtained from offset observation wells, and where reservoir pressure depletion causes deviations from expected fracture behavior. The results also show that microseismic responses are directly related to fracture pressure, and not simply the presence of fracturing fluid itself, leading to an improved understanding of the conditions under which microseismic events occur.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Dunn ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
K. C. Civinskas ◽  
R. J. Boyle

Time-averaged Stanton number and surface-pressure distributions are reported for the first-stage vane row and the first-stage blade row of the Rocketdyne Space Shuttle Main Engine two-stage fuel-side turbine. These measurements were made at 10, 50, and 90 percent span on both the pressure and suction surfaces of the component. Stanton-number distributions are also reported for the second-stage vane at 50 percent span. A shock tube is used as a short-duration source of heated and pressurized air to which the turbine is subjected. Platinum thin-film gages are used to obtain the heat-flux measurements and miniature silicone-diaphragm pressure transducers are used to obtain the surface pressure measurements. The first-stage vane Stanton number distributions are compared with predictions obtained using a quasi-three dimensional Navier–Stokes solution and a version of STAN5. This same N–S technique was also used to obtain predictions for the first blade and the second vane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document