Effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2475-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Uzunoglu-Özyürek ◽  
Selen Küçükkaya Eren ◽  
Sevilay Karahan
Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 2251
Author(s):  
Maciej Zarow ◽  
Marzena Dominiak ◽  
Katarzyna Szczeklik ◽  
Louis Hardan ◽  
Rim Bourgi ◽  
...  

Various material properties are involved in the success of endodontically treated restorations. At present, restorative composites are commonly employed as core build-up materials. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to assess the effect of using composite core materials on the in vitro fracture of endodontically treated teeth. Two different reviewers screened the literature, up to June 2021, in five distinct electronic databases: PubMed (MedLine), Scopus, Scielo, ISI Web of Science, and EMBASE. Only in vitro studies reporting the effect of the use of composite core materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth were included. A meta-analysis was carried out using a software program (Review Manager v5.4.1; The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). The risk of bias in each study was assessed following the parameters of another systematic review. A total of 5016 relevant papers were retrieved from all databases. After assessing the title and abstract, five publications remained for qualitative analysis. From these, only three studies remained for meta-analysis. The fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth where a core build-up composite was used was statistically significantly higher than the control (p = 0.04). Most of the analyses showed a high heterogenicity. The in vitro evidence suggests that the composite core build-up with higher filler content tended to improve the fracture resistance of the endodontically treated teeth, in comparison with conventional composite resins. This research received no external funding. Considering that this systematic review was only carried out on in vitro papers, registration was not performed. Furthermore, there were no identified clinical studies assessing core build-up materials; therefore, more well-designed research on these materials is needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva ◽  
Gabriela Rover ◽  
Felipe Gonçalves Belladonna ◽  
Gustavo De-Deus ◽  
Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dr Shivangi Shreya

After endodontic treatment, teeth are structurally different from untreated vital teeth, so these teeth require specialized treatment. The toughness of an endodontically treated tooth is associated to the tooth structure left. In vertical root fracture, resection of the affected root or extraction of the tooth is mandatory. Hence, this is a serious concern as there is an unfavorable prognosis leading to endodontic failure. One major cause for tooth fracture is found to be endodontic treatment in many in vivo studies. Vital teeth are less prone to fracture than nonvital teeth. It is a well-known fact that loss of structural integrity associated with the access preparation results in increased cuspal deflection during function leading to a higher occurrence of fractures. It is difficult to establish whether the occurrence of fractures depends on change in dentin structure or missing tooth structure. If endodontically treated teeth are not restored immediately, there is bacterial contamination and coronal microleakage, and this can lead to retreatment or endodontic failure. Hence, bonded restorations must be used to avoid microleakage. Based on above findings the present study was planned to evaluate the In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth with the Use of Different Root Canal Sealers. The present study was planned in Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India. For the in vitro study, 30 extracted maxillary central incisors from patients in the age group 30-55 years were obtained. After extraction, soft tissue and calculus were mechanically removed and teeth were stored in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 24 h to remove any remaining soft tissue. Certain teeth that had fracture lines, calcifications, surface irregularities were discarded, and a total of 20 teeth samples were obtained for the study. Although the sample size was small, it was sufficient to achieve a statistical difference. The teeth were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction using a diamond disc and water spray The sectioned teeth were taken, and a working length for each root was then established 1 mm short of the apical foramen using a No. 20 K-file. Further, the roots were divided randomly into four groups. The data generated from present study concludes that increased the fracture toughness of the instrumented roots after obturation. Therefore the ability of these materials i.e., Resilon and Epiphany sealer, Gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, guttapercha and Endomethasone sealer to reinforce the Endodontically treated teeth looks very promising but further long-term clinical studies are necessary to collect evidence based data thus to be able to support the confident use of these materials in day to day practice. Keywords: Fracture resistance, root canal sealers, Resilon, Epiphany, AH Plus Sealer, Endomethasone sealer, etc.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 655-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu ◽  
Jayakumar Jayaraman ◽  
Anand Suresh ◽  
Senthilnayagam Kalyanasundaram ◽  
Prasanna Neelakantan

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Soo Yee Chia ◽  
Abhishek Parolia ◽  
Benjamin Syek Hur Lim ◽  
Jayakumar Jayaraman ◽  
Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e038502
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zubair Ahmad ◽  
Durre Sadaf ◽  
Marcy McCall MacBain ◽  
Ahmed Nabil Mohamed

IntroductionRoot canal treatment is one of the oldest dental procedures for the treatment of endodontic infection. Extrusion of debris beyond the root apex during root canal instrumentation and subsequent persistence of pain are common complications. A systematic review of the evidence on reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems and their comparison with rotary single-file systems, with apical extrusion of debris as primary outcome, will be done through this study.Methods and analysisPublished ex vivo and in vitro studies with no language restriction will be included. We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Strategies will be incorporated to search grey literature also. Thorough evaluation of search results, completion of data abstraction and assessment of quality will be done by two reviewers independent from each other. Assessment of included studies will be done by utilising an evidence model developed on the basis of standards of quality reported in guidelines to document ex vivo and in vitro studies regarding dental materials and pertained for extrusion of debris apically and has been already used in quality assessment of studies involving quantification of debris extrusion apically. We will calculate the standardised mean differences for apically extruded debris, with congruent 95% CIs. We will measure the statistical heterogeneity by applying the Cochrane Q test and quantify using the I2 statistic. Existence of covariates and any potential heterogeneity will be explored through prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses.Ethics and disseminationApproval from an ethical research committee is not required because it will be done using data that have been already published and have no concerns related to the privacy of patients. Extensive dissemination of results from this review will be done through submission to a peer-reviewed journal for publication and conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019151804.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-573
Author(s):  
Ahlam Samran ◽  
Adnan Habib ◽  
Mazen Doumani ◽  
Abdulaziz Samran

<sec> <title>Objective:</title> This laboratory study aimed to evaluate the effect of self-adhesive root canal sealers on the fracture strength of root canals filled with Resilon or EndoREZ. </sec> <sec> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> A total of eighty extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected in this in-vitro study. All teeth were instrumented using a crown-down technique by FlexMaster rotary NiTi files. Specimens were divided into 4 test groups (n = 20) according to the sealer material: RS; RealSeal, RSS; RealSeal SE, MS; MetaSeal, and CG; (control group) zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer. Each main group was distributed into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the filling material either Resilon or EndoREZ and gutta-percha (n = 20) in the control group. Each root was mounted in acrylic resin blocks and subjected to fracture in a universal testing machine. The load values at root specimens fractured were registered in Newton’s and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test (α = 0.05). </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> The two-way analysis of variance analysis indicated that the filling material had a significant effect on the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth (p < 0.05) but not the sealer materials (p≥.05). Higher mean fracture strength was recorded in MetaSeal and Resilon group (1281.90±200.34 N) and lower mean fracture strength was shown in RealSeal and EndoREZ group (847.55±191.04 N). </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusion:</title> Self-adhesive (fourth-generation) resin sealers increased the fracture strength of root teeth more than self-etching (third-generation) root canal sealers when used with EndoREZ points. </sec>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document