On the effectiveness of the scientific peer-review system: a case study of the Journal of High Energy Physics

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-107
Author(s):  
Sandipan Sikdar ◽  
Paras Tehria ◽  
Matteo Marsili ◽  
Niloy Ganguly ◽  
Animesh Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
High Energy Physics ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Peer Review System ◽  
Review System ◽  
System A ◽  
Energy Physics

A case study on parallel HDF5 dataset concatenation for high energy physics data analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 102877
Author(s):  
Sunwoo Lee ◽  
Kai-yuan Hou ◽  
Kewei Wang ◽  
Saba Sehrish ◽  
Marc Paterno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
High Energy Physics ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Energy Physics

scholarly journals A case study in preserving a high energy physics application with Parrot

2015 ◽  
Vol 664 (3) ◽  
pp. 032022 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Meng ◽  
M Wolf ◽  
P Ivie ◽  
A Woodard ◽  
M Hildreth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Energy Physics ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Energy Physics

Learning with first, second, and no derivatives: A case study in high energy physics

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Battiti ◽  
Giampietro Tecchiolli
Keyword(s):  
High Energy Physics ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Energy Physics

scholarly journals Developing an Open, Networked Peer Review System

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Belojevic
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Digital Humanities ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Agile Development ◽  
Peer Review System ◽  
Review System

Using the Personas for Open, Networked Peer Review project as a case study, this paper discusses how best practices from creative technology-development contexts, such as agile development, can be applied in digital humanities projects.

scholarly journals Peer review in high-energy physics: a return to the origins?

2003 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. F04
Author(s):  
Marco Fabbrichesi
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
High Energy Physics ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Growth Of Science ◽  
Energy Physics

I still remember very clearly my first encounter with peer review: I was a Ph. D. student in physics and I had written my first paper, submitted it to a journal and - after what seemed to me a very long time - received a reply with the request for few changes and corrections I was supposed to include in my paper before it could be considered for publication. These very simple steps: the writing up of some original research results in a paper, its submission to a journal and the process of the work being read and judged by someone reputed to be an expert in the field is what we call peer review - the judging of scientific work by your peers - and it is an essential part of what science is. No scientific achievement can be considered as such until has been recognized by the community at large and such a recognition mainly comes from the peer review process. The presence of this check has arguably helped and fostered the constant and cumulative growth of science.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document