scholarly journals Cancer genetics: colorectal cancer as a model

2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter F. Bodmer
Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J Monahan ◽  
Nicola Bradshaw ◽  
Sunil Dolwani ◽  
Bianca Desouza ◽  
Malcolm G Dunlop ◽  
...  

Heritable factors account for approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and almost 30% of the population in the UK have a family history of CRC. The quantification of an individual’s lifetime risk of gastrointestinal cancer may incorporate clinical and molecular data, and depends on accurate phenotypic assessment and genetic diagnosis. In turn this may facilitate targeted risk-reducing interventions, including endoscopic surveillance, preventative surgery and chemoprophylaxis, which provide opportunities for cancer prevention. This guideline is an update from the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (BSG/ACPGBI) guidelines for colorectal screening and surveillance in moderate and high-risk groups; however, this guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC. On this occasion we invited the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), a subgroup within the British Society of Genetic Medicine (BSGM), as a partner to BSG and ACPGBI in the multidisciplinary guideline development process. We also invited external review through the Delphi process by members of the public as well as the steering committees of the European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.


2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuji Takayama ◽  
Koji Miyanishi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Hayashi ◽  
Yasushi Sato ◽  
Yoshiro Niitsu

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (18) ◽  
pp. 2084-2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos J. Gallego ◽  
Brian H. Shirts ◽  
Caroline S. Bennette ◽  
Greg Guzauskas ◽  
Laura M. Amendola ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the cost effectiveness of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyposis (CRCP) syndromes in patients referred to cancer genetics clinics. Patients and Methods We developed a decision model to evaluate NGS panel testing compared with current standard of care in patients referred to a cancer genetics clinic. We obtained data on the prevalence of genetic variants from a large academic laboratory and calculated the costs and health benefits of identifying relatives with a pathogenic variant, in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We classified the CRCP syndromes according to their type of inheritance and penetrance of colorectal cancer. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. Results Evaluation with an NGS panel that included Lynch syndrome genes and other genes associated with highly penetrant CRCP syndromes led to an average increase of 0.151 year of life, 0.128 QALY, and $4,650 per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $36,500 per QALY compared with standard care and a 99% probability that this panel was cost effective at a threshold of $100,000 per QALY. When compared with this panel, the addition of genes with low colorectal cancer penetrance resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $77,300 per QALY. Conclusion The use of an NGS panel that includes genes associated with highly penetrant CRCP syndromes in addition to Lynch syndrome genes as a first-line test is likely to provide meaningful clinical benefits in a cost-effective manner at a $100,000 per QALY threshold.


Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A200.1-A200
Author(s):  
S Stevens ◽  
L Sergot ◽  
F Turkes ◽  
J Smith ◽  
K Monahan

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas ◽  
George J. Chang ◽  
John M. Skibber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document