Analyses of acoustic emission response of a fault breccia in uniaxial deformation

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Slatalla ◽  
M. Alber ◽  
S. Kahraman
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Uniaxial Deformation ◽  
Fault Breccia

Acoustic emission pattern of shale under uniaxial deformation

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
C. H. Li ◽  
Y. Z. Hu ◽  
S. J. Miao
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Uniaxial Deformation ◽  
Emission Pattern

Comparison of Substructures Between Uniaxial and Biaxial Deformation in 1100-0 Aluminum

1981 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
D. L. Rohr ◽  
S. S. Hecker
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Strain ◽  
Cell Walls ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Mechanical Response ◽  
Biaxial Tension ◽  
Initial Deformation ◽  
Uniaxial Deformation ◽  
Biaxial Deformation ◽  
Stress States ◽  
Comprehensive Study

As part of a comprehensive study of microstructural and mechanical response of metals to uniaxial and biaxial deformations, the development of substructure in 1100 A1 has been studied over a range of plastic strain for two stress states.Specimens of 1100 aluminum annealed at 350 C were tested in uniaxial (UT) and balanced biaxial tension (BBT) at room temperature to different strain levels. The biaxial specimens were produced by the in-plane punch stretching technique. Areas of known strain levels were prepared for TEM by lapping followed by jet electropolishing. All specimens were examined in a JEOL 200B run at 150 and 200 kV within 24 to 36 hours after testing.The development of the substructure with deformation is shown in Fig. 1 for both stress states. Initial deformation produces dislocation tangles, which form cell walls by 10% uniaxial deformation, and start to recover to form subgrains by 25%. The results of several hundred measurements of cell/subgrain sizes by a linear intercept technique are presented in Table I.

Propagation of acoustic emission signals in metallic fuselage structure

2001 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.P. Dalton ◽  
P. Cawley ◽  
M.J. Lowe
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission

Comparison of random field strengths in (1-x)SrTiO3-xBiFeO3 and (1-x)SrTiO3-xBaTiO3 relaxor ferroelectrics by means of acoustic emission

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 20401
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Dul'kin ◽  
Michael Roth
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Random Field ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Bias Field ◽  
Relaxor Ferroelectrics ◽  
External Bias ◽  
Field Strengths

In relaxor (1-x)SrTiO3-xBiFeO3 ferroelectrics ceramics (x = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) both intermediate temperatures and Burns temperatures were successfully detected and their behavior were investigated in dependence on an external bias field using an acoustic emission. All these temperatures exhibit a non-trivial behavior, i.e. attain the minima at some threshold fields as a bias field enhances. It is established that the threshold fields decrease as x increases in (1-x)SrTiO3-xBiFeO3, as it previously observed in (1-x)SrTiO3-xBaTiO3 (E. Dul'kin, J. Zhai, M. Roth, Phys. Status Solidi B 252, 2079 (2015)). Based on the data of the threshold fields the mechanisms of arising of random electric fields are discussed and their strengths are compared in both these relaxor ferroelectrics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document