scholarly journals Stochastic cognitive mapping to build common ground for selecting cases in research projects

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jukka Tikkanen ◽  
Arto Haara ◽  
Liz Dinnie ◽  
Dominik Reusser ◽  
Teppo Hujala ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Wuelser ◽  
Carolina Adler ◽  
Thomas Breu ◽  
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn ◽  
Urs Wiesmann ◽  
...  

AbstractTo support societal problem solving, transdisciplinary research (TDR) uses knowledge co-production focusing on relevance and validity in a studied case and its particular social–ecological context. In the first instance, the resulting situated knowledge seems to be restricted to these single cases. However, if some of the knowledge generated in TDR could be used in other research projects, this would imply that there is a body of knowledge representing this special type of research. This study used a qualitative approach based on the methodology of grounded theory to empirically examine what knowledge is considered transferable to other cases, if any. 30 leaders of 12 Swiss-based TDR projects in the field of sustainable development were interviewed, representing both academia and practice. The transferable knowledge we found consists of the following: (1) Transdisciplinary principles, (2) transdisciplinary approaches, (3) systematic procedures, (4) product formats, (5) experiential know-how, (6) framings and (7) insights, data and information. The discussion of TDR has predominantly been focusing on transdisciplinary principles and approaches. In order to take knowledge co-production in TDR beyond an unmanageable field of case studies, more efforts in developing and critically discussing transferable knowledge of the other classes are needed, foremost systematic procedures, product formats and framings.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth D. Peña ◽  
Christine Fiestas

Abstract In this paper, we explore cultural values and expectations that might vary among different groups. Using the collectivist-individualist framework, we discuss differences in beliefs about the caregiver role in teaching and interacting with young children. Differences in these beliefs can lead to dissatisfaction with services on the part of caregivers and with frustration in service delivery on the part of service providers. We propose that variation in caregiver and service provider perspectives arise from cultural values, some of which are instilled through our own training as speech-language pathologists. Understanding where these differences in cultural orientation originate can help to bridge these differences. These can lead to positive adaptations in the ways that speech-language pathology services are provided within an early intervention setting that will contribute to effective intervention.


2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Brauner ◽  
Bernhard Orth

Zusammenfassung: Die sozialpsychologische Gruppenforschung hat in den vergangenen Jahren eine Reihe von Veränderungen erfahren. Hierzu gehören einerseits Verlagerungen inhaltlicher Schwerpunkte der Forschung hin zur Analyse von Informationsverarbeitungsprozessen und andererseits Weiterentwicklungen methodischer Ansätze. Insbesondere Prozessanalysen verbaler Daten werden verstärkt gefordert und auch durchgeführt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird gezeigt, dass beiden Trends genüge getan werden kann, indem das Cognitive Mapping ( Axelrod, 1976 ) mit der Monotone Netzwerkanalyse ( Orth, 1998 ) kombiniert wird. Die Stärke beider Methoden liegt hierbei auf der Herausarbeitung von Strukturen von Argumentationen, die in Gruppendiskussionen angebracht werden. Der Ansatz ist außerdem geeignet, soziale Repräsentationen zu untersuchen und abzubilden.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund Wascher ◽  
C. Beste

Spatial selection of relevant information has been proposed to reflect an emergent feature of stimulus processing within an integrated network of perceptual areas. Stimulus-based and intention-based sources of information might converge in a common stage when spatial maps are generated. This approach appears to be inconsistent with the assumption of distinct mechanisms for stimulus-driven and top-down controlled attention. In two experiments, the common ground of stimulus-driven and intention-based attention was tested by means of event-related potentials (ERPs) in the human EEG. In both experiments, the processing of a single transient was compared to the selection of a physically comparable stimulus among distractors. While single transients evoked a spatially sensitive N1, the extraction of relevant information out of a more complex display was reflected in an N2pc. The high similarity of the spatial portion of these two components (Experiment 1), and the replication of this finding for the vertical axis (Experiment 2) indicate that these two ERP components might both reflect the spatial representation of relevant information as derived from the organization of perceptual maps, just at different points in time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document