scholarly journals Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1053-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motonari Ri ◽  
Naoki Hiki ◽  
Naoki Ishizuka ◽  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
Koshi Kumagai ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Lihu Gu ◽  
Kang Zhang ◽  
Zefeng Shen ◽  
Xianfa Wang ◽  
Hepan Zhu ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Yeul Lee ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Soo-Jeong Cho ◽  
Chan Gyoo Kim ◽  
Il Ju Choi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyuan Li ◽  
Jianghao Xu ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
Weizhi Wang ◽  
Diancai Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: This study aimed to compare patient outcomes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer between a group who underwent a duodenal stump reinforcement procedure and those who did not.Methods: Data from 233 patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing distal gastrectomy under laparoscope combined with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups. The non-reinforcement group (NR) underwent surgery from June 2014 to March 2015 with no reinforcement of the duodenal stump (n=54) and the reinforcement group (R) underwent surgery from April 2015 to June 2018 with reinforcement of the duodenal stump (n=179). In group R, the duodenum was divided using an endoscope-assisted linear stapler, which was reinforced by a purse-string suture along the duodenal staple line. Results: Duodenal stump leakage was observed in 2 patients from group NR (3.7%), while no duodenal stump leakage or fistula was detected in group R. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the patient characteristics between group NR and R.Conclusions: The incidence of duodenal stump leakage can be reduced by reinforcement with a purse-string suture.


2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. D. Kostakis ◽  
A. Alexandrou ◽  
E. Armeni ◽  
C. Damaskos ◽  
G. Kouraklis ◽  
...  

Aims: We compared laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomies with open gastrectomies and with each other that were held for gastric cancer in Europe. Methods: We searched for studies conducted in Europe and published up to 20 February 2015 in the PubMed database that compared laparoscopic or robotic with open gastrectomies for gastric cancer and with each other. Results: We found 18 original studies (laparoscopic vs open: 13; robotic vs open: 3; laparoscopic vs robotic: 2). Of these, 17 were non-randomized trials and only 1 was a randomized controlled trial. Only four studies had more than 50 patients in each arm. No significant differences were detected between minimally invasive and open approaches regarding the number of retrieved lymph nodes, anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, anastomotic stenosis, postoperative bleeding, reoperation rates, and intraoperative/postoperative mortality. Nevertheless, laparoscopic procedures provided higher overall morbidity rates when compared with open ones, but robotic approaches did not differ from open ones. On the contrary, blood loss was less and hospital stay was shorter in minimally invasive than in open approaches. However, the results were controversial concerning the duration of operations when comparing minimally invasive with open gastrectomies. Additionally, laparoscopic and robotic procedures provided equivalent results regarding resection margins, duodenal stump leakage, postoperative bleeding, intraoperative/postoperative mortality, and length of hospital stay. On the contrary, robotic operations had less blood loss, but lasted longer than laparoscopic ones. Finally, there were relatively low conversion rates in laparoscopic (0%–6.7%) and robotic gastrectomies (0%–5.6%) in most studies. Conclusion: Laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomies may be considered alternative approaches to open gastrectomies for treating gastric cancer. Minimally invasive operations are characterized by less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than open ones. In addition, robotic procedures have less blood loss, but last longer than laparoscopic ones.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyuan Li ◽  
Jianghao Xu ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
Weizhi Wang ◽  
Caidian Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to compare patient outcomes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer between a group who underwent a duodenal stump reinforcement procedure and those who did not.Methods: Data from 233 patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing distal gastrectomy under laparoscope combined with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups. The non-reinforcement group (NR) underwent surgery from June 2014 to March 2015 with no reinforcement of the duodenal stump (n=54) and the reinforcement group (R) underwent surgery from April 2015 to June 2018 with reinforcement of the duodenal stump (n=179). In group R, the duodenum was divided using an endoscope-assisted linear stapler, which was reinforced by a purse-string suture along the duodenal staple line. Results: Duodenal stump leakage was observed in 2 patients from group NR (3.7%), while no duodenal stump leakage or fistula was detected in group R. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the patient characteristics between group NR and R.Conclusions: The incidence of duodenal stump leakage can be reduced by reinforcement with a purse-string suture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document