Population dynamics and crude oil degrading ability of bacterial consortia of isolates from oil-contaminated sites in Nigeria

Author(s):  
Obianuju Obiajulu Nnabuife ◽  
James Chukwuma Ogbonna ◽  
Chukwudi Anyanwu ◽  
Anthony Chibuogwu Ike
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainon Hamzah ◽  
Chia-Wei Phan ◽  
Nur Faizah Abu Bakar ◽  
Kok-Kee Wong

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Cocârţă ◽  
Mihaela Stoian ◽  
Aykan Karademir

2016 ◽  
Vol 167 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 731-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinzi Wang ◽  
Xiaohui Zhao ◽  
Hanbing Li ◽  
Jianli Jia ◽  
Yueqiao Liu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lumeshwari Sahu

Abstract: In this study, we isolated seven strains (termed BY1–7) from polluted soil at an oil station and evaluated their abilities to degrade total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs). Among 45 bacterial colonies one bacterial strain was identified based on the cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics. The isolated bacterium was then subjected to a preliminary assessment of their crude oil after 48 hours of incubation on nutrient agar plates overlaid with 100 ML of petroleum crude oil, the zone of clearance was observed. The isolated bacteria showed 35% petrol degradation, whereas a relatively high oil degradation rate, almost 40% was observed when the bacterium was acclimatized. The selected bacterial strains crude oil resistance was analysed based on the growth ability on the crude oil containing mediums. This strain was identified as Brevibacterium brevis. After inoculation, growth ability was measured and the highest percentage of petrol degradation occurred at temperature 37 °C with the value 30.8%. Bacteria displaying such capabilities are often exploited for the bio-remediation of petroleum oil contaminated environments. Recently, microbial remediation technology has developed rapidly and achieved major gains. However, this technology is not omnipotent. It is affected by many environmental factors that hinder its practical application, limiting the large-scale application of the technology. Keywords: Petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading Bacteria, Petroleum oil, Bio-remediation, Bacterial consortia, Environmental factors, Enzymes.


2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 6316-6324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsuko Hamamura ◽  
Sarah H. Olson ◽  
David M. Ward ◽  
William P. Inskeep

ABSTRACT Soil bacterial population dynamics were examined in several crude-oil-contaminated soils to identify those organisms associated with alkane degradation and to assess patterns in microbial response across disparate soils. Seven soil types obtained from six geographically distinct areas of the United States (Arizona, Oregon, Indiana, Virginia, Oklahoma, and Montana) were used in controlled contamination experiments containing 2% (wt/wt) crude oil spiked with [1-14C]hexadecane. Microbial populations present during hydrocarbon degradation were analyzed using both 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and by traditional methods for cultivating hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria. After a 50-day incubation, all seven soils showed comparable hydrocarbon depletion, where >80% of added crude oil was depleted and approximately 40 to 70% of added [14C]hexadecane was converted to 14CO2. However, the initial rates of hydrocarbon depletion differed up to 10-fold, and preferential utilization of shorter-chain-length n-alkanes relative to longer-chain-length n-alkanes was observed in some soils. Distinct microbial populations developed, concomitant with crude-oil depletion. Phylogenetically diverse bacterial populations were selected across different soils, many of which were identical to hydrocarbon-degrading isolates obtained from the same systems (e.g., Nocardioides albus, Collimonas sp., and Rhodococcus coprophilus). In several cases, soil type was shown to be an important determinant, defining specific microorganisms responding to hydrocarbon contamination. However, similar Rhodococcus erythropolis-like populations were observed in four of the seven soils and were the most common hydrocarbon-degrading organisms identified via cultivation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 1451-1461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunzi Xiong ◽  
Xia Li ◽  
Jianfa Chen ◽  
Liping Zhao ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document