scholarly journals Role of local excision in the management of rectal cancer: what does the future hold?

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 731-734
Author(s):  
P. A. Cataldo
1985 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 694-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Whiteway ◽  
R. J. Nicholls ◽  
B. C. Morson
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Skibber

Local excision can be a definitive surgical procedure for some early cancers of the rectum, and it is an appealing technique in many ways. It reduces overall surgical trauma and can assure sphincter preservation. It is also associated with low morbidity. However, this technique has a number of limitations also. This article discusses the results of local excision for rectal carcinoma, including histologic features that impact survival and local recurrence-free rates, the importance of careful patient selection, and the potential role of adjuvant and salvage therapies. Technical considerations and alternative therapies are also discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Coco ◽  
A. Manno ◽  
C. Mattana ◽  
A. Verbo ◽  
G. Rizzo ◽  
...  

10.1002/ssu.7 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Rothenberger ◽  
Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 101687
Author(s):  
Lisanne J.H. Smits ◽  
Annabel S. van Lieshout ◽  
Alexander A.J. Grüter ◽  
Karin Horsthuis ◽  
Jurriaan B. Tuynman

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 537-537
Author(s):  
Maria C. Russell ◽  
Yj Chiang ◽  
Barry W. Feig ◽  
George J. Chang ◽  
Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas ◽  
...  

537 Background: As the interest in local excision (LE) for rectal cancer increases, the risk of residual nodal disease and local failure must be considered. We utilized a nationwide cancer registry to establish incidence and predictors of nodal metastasis in early pathologic T stage rectal cancers. Methods: Early path T stage rectal cancers (1998-2007) were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), including pT1-2 tumors in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NT), or ypT0-2 tumors after NT. Proctectomy was performed in 22,416 (74.7%) and LE in 7,589 (25.3%) without NT. After NT, 7,481 (96.1%) underwent proctectomy and 300 (3.9%) LE. Nodal metastasis rates were calculated from proctectomy patients. Factors associated with nodal metastases were analyzed among those with ≥12 nodes assessed. Results: The incidence of nodal positivity was 12.5% for pT1 and 26.8% for pT2 tumors. Among those with ≥12 nodes examined, these rates increased to 16.9% and 28.6% respectively. After receiving NT, nodal positivity rates were 8.6% for ypT0, 12.9% for ypT1, and 21.4% for ypT2 tumors. These rates increased to 13.5%, 16.9% and 28.3% respectively when ≥12 nodes examined. In multivariate analysis, female sex, age <50, higher T stage, higher histologic grade, mucinous/signet-ring features, and more than 12 nodes examined were all significantly associated with nodal metastases in both groups ( Table ). Conclusions: Among rectal cancers of early path T stages, the risk of nodal metastasis increases with higher path T stage and with greater number of nodes examined, regardless of receipt of NT. These findings must be carefully deliberated, given the current interests in expanding the role of LE based on pathologic T stage of rectal cancer. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina B. Lonsdorf ◽  
Jan Richter

Abstract. As the criticism of the definition of the phenotype (i.e., clinical diagnosis) represents the major focus of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, it is somewhat surprising that discussions have not yet focused more on specific conceptual and procedural considerations of the suggested RDoC constructs, sub-constructs, and associated paradigms. We argue that we need more precise thinking as well as a conceptual and methodological discussion of RDoC domains and constructs, their interrelationships as well as their experimental operationalization and nomenclature. The present work is intended to start such a debate using fear conditioning as an example. Thereby, we aim to provide thought-provoking impulses on the role of fear conditioning in the age of RDoC as well as conceptual and methodological considerations and suggestions to guide RDoC-based fear conditioning research in the future.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Bartels ◽  
Oleg Urminsky ◽  
Shane Frederick
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document