Prospective evaluation of transanal irrigation for fecal incontinence and constipation

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Juul ◽  
P. Christensen
2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 731-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Siggaard Jørgensen ◽  
Konstantinos Kamperis ◽  
Line Modin ◽  
Charlotte Siggaard Rittig ◽  
Søren Rittig

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Christensen ◽  
Klaus Krogh ◽  
Steen Buntzen ◽  
Fariborz Payandeh ◽  
Søren Laurberg

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1567-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Liberman ◽  
Julio Faria ◽  
Charles A. Ternent ◽  
Garnet J. Blatchford ◽  
Mark A. Christensen ◽  
...  

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1174
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Caruso ◽  
Mario Pietro Marcello Milazzo ◽  
Denisia Bommarito ◽  
Vincenza Girgenti ◽  
Glenda Amato ◽  
...  

Background: Transanal irrigation (TAI) is employed for children with fecal incontinence, but it can present several problems which require a study of their outcomes among different pathologies and without a tailored work up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced protocol in order to tailor TAI, prevent complications, and evaluate outcomes. Methods: We included 70 patients (14 anorectal malformation, 12 Hirschsprung’s disease, 24 neurological impairment, 20 functional incontinence) submitted to a comprehensive protocol with Peristeen®: fecal score, volumetric enema, rectal ultrasound, anorectal 3D manometry, and diary for testing and parameter adjustment. Results: Among the patients, 62.9% needed adaptations to the parameters, mainly volume of irrigated water and number of puffs of balloon. These adaptations were positively correlated with pre-treatment manometric and enema data. In each group, the improvement of score was statistically significant in all cases (p 0.000); the main factor influencing the efficacy was the rate of sphincter anomalies. The ARM group had slower improvement than other groups, whereas functional patients had the best response. Conclusions: Our results showed that TAI should not be standardized for all patients, because each one has different peculiarities; evaluation of patients before TAI with rectal ultrasound, enema, and manometry allowed us to tailor the treatment, highlighting different outcomes among various pathologies, thus improving the efficacy


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Samit Patel ◽  
Puanani Hopson ◽  
Jeffrey Bornstein ◽  
Shaista Safder

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document