scholarly journals Neither inflammatory bowel disease nor immunosuppressants are associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19: an observational Dutch cohort study

Author(s):  
Lennard P. L. Gilissen ◽  
Stefan G. H. Heinen ◽  
Lotte Rijpma-Jacobs ◽  
Erik Schoon ◽  
Ramon-Michel Schreuder ◽  
...  
Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 1597-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone N Vigod ◽  
Paul Kurdyak ◽  
Hilary K Brown ◽  
Geoffrey C Nguyen ◽  
Laura E Targownik ◽  
...  

ObjectivePatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an elevated risk of mental illness. We determined the incidence and correlates of new-onset mental illness associated with IBD during pregnancy and post partum.DesignThis cohort study using population-based health administrative data included all women with a singleton live birth in Ontario, Canada (2002–2014). The incidence of new-onset mental illness from conception to 1-year post partum was compared between 3721 women with and 798 908 without IBD, generating adjusted HRs (aHR). Logistic regression was used to identify correlates of new-onset mental illness in the IBD group.ResultsAbout 22.7% of women with IBD had new-onset mental illness versus 20.4% without, corresponding to incidence rates of 150.2 and 132.8 per 1000 patient-years (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.20), or one extra case of new-onset mental illness per 43 pregnant women with IBD. The risk was elevated in the post partum (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.31), but not during pregnancy, and for Crohn’s disease (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.23), but not ulcerative colitis. The risk was specifically elevated for a new-onset mood or anxiety disorder (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) and alcohol or substance use disorders (aHR 2.73, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.26). Predictors of a mental illness diagnosis were maternal age, delivery year, medical comorbidity, number of prenatal visits, family physician obstetrical care and infant mortality.ConclusionWomen with IBD were at an increased risk of new-onset psychiatric diagnosis in the postpartum period, but not during pregnancy. Providers should look to increase opportunities for prevention, early identification and treatment accordingly.


Gut ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 1279-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Jess ◽  
Morten Frisch ◽  
Kristian Tore Jørgensen ◽  
Bo Vestergaard Pedersen ◽  
Nete Munk Nielsen

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-402
Author(s):  
Marianne K. Vester-Andersen ◽  
Michelle V. Prosberg ◽  
Ida Vind ◽  
Mikael Anderson ◽  
Tine Jess ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
pp. A-14-A-15
Author(s):  
Henrik Nielsen ◽  
Kim Gradel ◽  
Hans L. Nielsen ◽  
Henrik C. Schønheyder ◽  
Brian Kristensen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S410
Author(s):  
C A Lamb ◽  
S Sebastian ◽  
A J Kent ◽  
J P Segal ◽  
H A Gonzalez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the early COVID-19 pandemic, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) developed a risk stratification grid to inform the United Kingdom (UK) government regarding strict social isolation, termed “shielding”. This advised inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients thought to be most clinically vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 outcomes, to stay at home and minimize face to face contact, even with household members. Those considered at highest risk included recent commencement of combination biologic and immunomodulator therapy, prednisolone ≥20mg/day, presence of comorbidities, age ≥70 years or clinically active disease in those receiving immunosuppression. Mesalazine was not considered to increase risk. An acknowledged limitation was an absence of COVID-19 risk data. This study sought to identify patient or IBD medication-related factors associated with severe outcomes from COVID-19. Methods PREPARE-IBD was a multi-centre observational United Kingdom (UK) cohort study including adult IBD patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR between 1st March 2020 and 31st August 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19 defined as requirement for intensive care admission, invasive ventilation or death. We tested associations of severe outcomes with medications and other covariates using multiple logistic regression. Results 211 patients were included from 60 UK centres. 56 of 211 patients (26.5%) met the primary outcome. Severe COVID-19 was more common in ulcerative colitis relative to Crohn’s disease patients (33.9% [37/109] vs. 18.6% [16/86], p=0.018). Shortness of breath, nausea and vomiting were more common with severe COVID-19 (p<0.001 and p=0.023 respectively). Multivariable analysis identified co-morbidities and age as associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes; odds ratio (OR [95% CI]) 1.68 (1.23-2.35) for each co-morbidity, and an OR 1.03 (1.00-1.05) with each successive year of age. Neither clinically active IBD (OR 0.58 [0.26-1.26]), non-white ethnicity (OR 1.98 [0.92-4.28]), nor prednisolone use (OR 2.42 [0.47-11.26]) were associated with increased risk. On multivariable analysis, mesalazine was associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes (OR 2.03 [1.01-4.12]). Univariable analysis identified biologics and thiopurines as protective (OR 0.38 [0.15-0.87] and 0.32 [0.092-0.86] respectively). On multivariable analysis no association of severe COVID-19 outcomes with thiopurine or biologic exposure was seen. Conclusion Our data provide reassurance for the continued evidence-based use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators and biologic therapies in IBD during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and is consistent with an as yet unexplained association between mesalazine use and severe COVID-19 outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document