scholarly journals Queue hurdle Coxian phase-type model for two-stage process of population-based cancer screening

Author(s):  
Hsiao-Hsuan Jen ◽  
Chen-Yang Hsu ◽  
Amy Ming-Fang Yen ◽  
Han-Mo Chiu ◽  
Hsiu-Hsi Chen

AbstractThe quality assurance of two-stage population-based cancer screening program is determined by arrival rate (attending screening), positive rate (determined by the criteria of screening test), the compliance and the waiting time (WT) for confirmatory diagnosis in those screened as positive. These parameters were correlated between the process of screening procedures and the effectiveness of screening program. To capture such an inter-dependence of these parameters and quantify the effectiveness of program, we proposed a Queue hurdle Coxian phase-type (QH-CPH) model to estimate the arrival rate of screenees with the Poisson Queue process and the compliance rate of confirmatory diagnosis with the hurdle model, and also to identify the hidden states of WT that is affected by the capacity of health care and relevant covariates (such as demographic features and geographic areas) with the Coxian phase-type (CPH) process. We applied the proposed QH-CPH model to Taiwanese nationwide colorectal cancer screening program data for estimating the arrival rate and the probability of not complying with colonoscopy and classifying the compliers into two hidden states, short-waiting phase and long-waiting phase for colonoscopy. Significant covariates responsible for three processes were also identified by using the proportional hazards regression forms. A simulation study was further performed to assess the joint effect of these parameters on WT through a series of scenarios. The proposed QH-CPH model can provide an insight into the optimal and the practical design on population-based cancer screening for health policy-makers given the limited health care resources and capacity.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 53s-53s
Author(s):  
A. Kedar ◽  
R. Hariprasad ◽  
R. Kanan ◽  
R. Mehrotra

Background: India is facing noncommunicable diseases epidemic with cancer as one of the main reasons of mortality. To bring this epidemic under control and as a measure of secondary prevention, government of India has rolled out operational framework for population cancer screening. As cancer screening is a new concept for Indian health care providers, this study focuses on the attitudes and perceptions of HCP from a district in Assam. Aim: To know the attitudes and perceptions of healthcare providers in Assam about the implementation of population based cancer screening program in India. Methods: This study was a part of ongoing Indian Council of Medical Research project at Cachar district, Assam. The study was conducted at Silchar, Assam and the study participants were attendees of the master trainers' workshop which was conducted for the pilot cancer screening program rolled out in Cachar district, Assam. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from the health care providers on the last day of the training. Data were gathered from 58 participants. The participants were medical officers, auxillary nurse midwives (ANM), accredited social health activists (ASHA), staff nurses, nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives and other health care providers from public health facilities. Results: Majority of the study participants agreed with the concept of screening. Half of the study participants stated that they could conduct screening comfortably along with their other responsibilities. Lack of human resources and an overburdened human resource were the main challenges foreseen in the implementation of the program. 91% of the participants wanted GOI to implement the cancer screening program. Majority of the health personnel were in favor of primary health center (PHC) as the first preferable site of population cancer screening followed by subcenter being second on preference for screening. One-third of study participants opined that screening should be done by specialist doctors. Almost one fifth of participants stated that ASHA should do the screening and almost same number of participants thought that medical officer at PHC should do the screening. Conclusion: This is the first pilot study on the population based cancer screening guidelines released by the government of India. The organized screening program is yet to be rolled out in the country. Though many challenges were foreseen by the healthcare providers in carrying out the population based cancer screening, majority were optimistic for the implementation of this screening program.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106420
Author(s):  
Nuria Vives ◽  
Núria Milà ◽  
Gemma Binefa ◽  
Noemie Travier ◽  
Albert Farre ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián González-Marrón ◽  
Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Ferrán Garcia-Alemany ◽  
Encarna Martínez-Martín ◽  
Nuria Matilla-Santander ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris Giai ◽  
Catherine Exbrayat ◽  
Bastien Boussat ◽  
Florence Poncet ◽  
Patrice Bureau du Colombier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elle De Jesus ◽  
Hamidou Thiam ◽  
Landing Sagna ◽  
Zola Collins ◽  
Nicole Danfakha ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe improvement of quality at the primary health care level in low resource settings is key to addressing health equity challenges around the world. In 2014, a Sénégal-Peace Corps-University of Illinois at Chicago partnership began to study the impact of a community-engaged quality improvement program on health services and regional health system determinants to prevent cervical cancer, the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in Sénégal. The purpose of this paper is to describe how a multi-site participatory quality improvement (QI) approach can identify access barriers and provide contextualized programmatic recommendations to strengthen the cervical cancer screening program in the rural Kédougou region of Sénégal and inform higher-level program implementation and sustainment.Methods: We adapted a facility-level quality improvement process by involving community health committee representatives. Using a mixed methods case study approach, we collected data at nine demonstration sites in the Kédougou region from quality improvement program action plans, client surveys, health leader interviews, and service guidelines discussions at the regional level from January 2015 through June 2019. We calculated the demand and supply-side barriers and organized them into the Levesque Patient-Centered Access to Health Care Framework.ResultsDuring the study period, 27 quality improvement meetings took place. There was a total of 50 (14 unique) stated access barriers to cervical cancer prevention across all sites. The health service barriers were concentrated in approachability (5) and availability and accommodation (16), whereas the demand-side barriers were concentrated in the ability to perceive (14) and ability to seek care (3). Individual health facilities responded with increased community outreach among other interventions while regional programmatic recommendations led to strategic partnership initiatives such as social mobilization and peer-to-peer education activities. ConclusionsThe community-engaged QI process has meaningfully contributed to strategic planning of the implementation and sustainment of a cervical cancer screening program within the context of rural Kédougou, Sénégal. The iterative and patient-focused nature of QI has allowed health personnel to continually strengthen how they deliver their health services to meet the community’s needs while data aggregated from QI action plans across multiple sites has helped inform responsive health policies to ensure program sustainment. The parallel and iterative application of participatory capacity building and QI activities across multiple sites provides a useful approach for implementing sustainable cervical cancer programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document