Implementation of a Software Distribution Intervention to Improve Workload Balance in an Academic Pediatric Radiology Department

Author(s):  
Marla B. K. Sammer ◽  
Andrew Stahl ◽  
Eray Ozkan ◽  
Andrew C. Sher
2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Ling Ng ◽  
Jo Yazer ◽  
Mohammed Abdolell ◽  
Peter Brown

Purpose To identify subspecialty fields in Canadian academic radiology departments that are at risk for future manpower shortages. To determine reasons for the potential shortages and suggest potential solutions. Methods An anonymous online survey was sent by e-mail to radiology residents and academic radiology department heads in Canada. The survey was open from April 1 to August 1, 2006. Statistical analysis by using the SAS Frequency Procedure was performed on the results. Results Interventional radiology, neuroradiology, mammography, cardiac imaging, and pediatric radiology were identified as areas in which there will be increasing workforce demands. Mammography, pediatric radiology, and cardiac imaging were identified as areas in which there will be a potential decrease in supply. Of the residents, 65.83% intended on pursuing subspecialty training. Priorities were interesting work, job availability, and work schedule. Nuclear medicine, mammography, pediatric radiology, and interventional radiology were identified as the top 4 areas in which residents specifically did not want to pursue further subspecialty training. Only 15% of resident respondents received career counseling during residency, and only 50% of those residents thought it was adequate. Conclusions Our survey results indicate that mammography, cardiac imaging, and pediatric radiology are at risk for manpower shortages, and interventional radiology may be at risk. Increased efforts to recruit trainees may be necessary to ensure that these subspecialties maintain their presence in the future. Only 15% of the surveyed residents received career counseling during residency. This is a relatively untapped forum that academic staff could use to help recruit new trainees into these underserved subspecialties.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Albertina Rusandu ◽  
Erling Stranden

Introduction Due to Norway’s population density, demographic scatter and topography, performing radiological examinations in children in the same unit as in adults is quite common despite international guidelines recommending use of dedicated pediatric radiology units. Children examined in non-dedicated pediatric facilities are therefore a unique patient group who requires special attention. This study investigates pediatric radiography practice at a small local hospital lacking a dedicated pediatric radiology department by comparing it with the ideals of good practice as stated by international agencies. The aspects analyzed are organization, radiation safety and optimization. Methods The approach is qualitative, based on participant observation, document investigation and interviews with radiographers. Results Radiologists evaluated referrals. Age specific pediatric CT-protocols were being used. Awareness of the greater radiation risk in children and radiation safety concern were common among the radiographers.  Some radiographers had experience from pediatric imaging departments while none of them had postgraduate studies in pediatric radiography. Lack of extensive practice due to reduced pediatric patient volume makes sometimes the examination of children be a challenging task. Communication with children seemed to go well. Conclusion Despite variations in experience with children among radiographers and lack of specialization in pediatric radiography, the practice is largely in accordance with international recommendations. Radiation protection and optimization requirements met, although the departmental organization slightly diverges from prevailing guidelines. Slightly different practice and experience with children among radiographers indicate the need for special guidelines for pediatric imaging for non-dedicated pediatric radiology departments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond W. Sze ◽  
Chido D. Vera ◽  
Laurie Hogan ◽  
Ramesh S. Iyer

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Luana Stanescu ◽  
Marguerite T. Parisi ◽  
Edward Weinberger ◽  
Mark R. Ferguson ◽  
Randolph K. Otto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1059-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit B. Ertl-Wagner ◽  
Wayne Lee ◽  
David E. Manson ◽  
Joao G. Amaral ◽  
Zoran Bojic ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-324
Author(s):  
C. Calandrino ◽  
P. D’Ambra

2014 ◽  
Vol 202 (4) ◽  
pp. 790-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Matthew Hawkins ◽  
Christopher G. Anton ◽  
Wendy M. Bankes ◽  
Alan D. Leach ◽  
Michael J. Zeno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document