Comparative analysis of the visual and refractive outcomes of a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens with and without toricity: 1-year results

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Shodai ◽  
Kazuno Negishi ◽  
Hiroyuki Arai ◽  
Ikuko Toda ◽  
Hidemasa Torii ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1605-1614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Alió ◽  
Ana B. Plaza-Puche ◽  
David P. Piñero ◽  
Jaime Javaloy ◽  
María José Ayala

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 761-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Kim ◽  
Ahmar Sajjad ◽  
Ildamaris Montes de Oca ◽  
Douglas D. Koch ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145
Author(s):  
B. E. Malyugin ◽  
E. N. Panteleev ◽  
A. N. Bessarabov ◽  
D. F. Pokrovskiy ◽  
A. S. Semakina ◽  
...  

Purpose: to carry out a comparative analysis of refractive outcomes and features during preoperational calculation of the biplanar intraocular lens (IOL) with iridocapsular and iridovitreal fixation.Patients and methods. Study included the analysis IOL model RSP-3 implantation after phacoemulsification cataract surgery with  subluxated lens grade 2. Analyzed 309 eyes of 304 patients with iridocapsular (n = 44) (ICF) and iridovitreal fixation (n = 265)  (IVF). In both groups IOL power was calculated with use of A- constant (118.2) recommended by manufacturer. Mean period of  examination was 6 months. To count optimized A-constant in both  groups we used next data: IOL power and axial length before  surgery, keratometry, spherical equivalent and IOL effective position  during 6 months after surgery.Results. In group with ICF postoperative refraction was achieved ± 0,5 D in 10 cases (23%), in group IVF — in 29 cases (11%). Mean  value of optimized A-constant for IOL model RSP-3 in groups with  ICF and IVF were 117.2 ± 1.18 (114.0–120.8) and 116.9 ± 1,89  (109.6 до 123.6). There were no statistically significant difference  between compared groups (p = 0.46).Conclusion. Use of A-constant recommended by manufacturer do  not allow achieving target refraction in most cases. Mean values of  biplanar IOL A-constant counted for ICF and IVF were 117,2 and  116,9 respectively, what should be taken into account during IOL  power count, according to its fixation method.


2009 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-220.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fernández-Vega ◽  
José F. Alfonso ◽  
Begoña Baamonde ◽  
David Madrid-Costa ◽  
Robert Montés-Micó ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Seok Chung ◽  
Jae Lim Chung ◽  
Young Jun Kim ◽  
Hun Lee ◽  
Jae Yong Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to compare refractive outcomes between total keratometry using a swept-source optical biometer and conventional keratometry in cataract surgery with refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We included patients who underwent cataract surgery with refractive multifocal IOL implantation. The IOL power was calculated using conventional formulas (Haigis, SRK/T, Holladay 2, and Barrett Universal II) as well as a new formula (Barrett TK Universal II). The refractive mean error, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were compared, as were the proportions of eyes within ± 0.25 diopters (D), ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D of prediction error. In total 543 eyes of 543 patients, the absolute prediction error of total keratometry was significantly higher than that of conventional keratometry using the SRK/T (P = 0.034) and Barrett Universal II (P = 0.003). The proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D of the prediction error using the SRK/T and Barrett Universal II was also significantly higher when using conventional keratometry than total keratometry (P = 0.010 for SRK/T and P = 0.005 for Barrett Universal II). Prediction accuracy of conventional keratometry was higher than that of total keratometry in cataract surgery with refractive multifocal IOL implantation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Šivec Trampuž ◽  
Kristina Mikek ◽  
Metka Krampf

Abstract Background: Multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is generally not considered in patients with keratoconus; however, it may provide good optical results in selected patients with stage I and II keratoconus based on two case reports. Aims: To evaluate patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes in this patient population.Methods: This is a retrospective single-center, non-interventional, non-comparison study. All patients with frank keratoconus who had undergone a trifocal IOL implantation between 2016 and 2019 were invited to participate in this study (18 eyes of 9 patients). Postoperatively, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and ocular aberrations were recorded. A questionnaire was used for determining patient satisfaction and their quality of life. The mean follow-up time was 31.22 ± 6.38 months.Results: Postoperatively the patients’ uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 1.13 ± 0.93 to 0.10 ± 0.17 (p˂0.001), corrected distance visual acuity went from 0.10 ± 0.11 to 0.05 ± 0.09 (p=0.19), mean refractive spherical equivalent changed from -4.34 ± 4.31 to 0.05 ± 0.51 D (p˂0.001), and manifest astigmatism from 2.44 ± 1.92 to 0.88 ± 1.81 D (p=0.017). A target refraction of less than ± 0.50 D was achieved in 17 eyes (94%) and one eye exhibited a hyperopic MRSE of +2.0 D. Three eyes (17%) lost 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and no patient lost two or more lines. The patients were independent of glasses in 78% for all distances. Conclusions: A trifocal IOL currently gives relatively good, predictable results with most patients feeling satisfied with the results of spectacle independence for all distances.


2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 685-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Pineda-Fernández ◽  
Jorge Jaramillo ◽  
Vanessa Celis ◽  
José Vargas ◽  
Mauro DiStacio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document