Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facilitates Breast Conservation for Occult Breast Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Olson ◽  
Elizabeth A. Morris ◽  
Kimberly J. Van Zee ◽  
David C. Linehan ◽  
Patrick I. Borgen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Occult Breast Cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging detection and wire localization of an ‘occult’ breast cancer

1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Davis ◽  
Thomas B. Julian ◽  
Melinda Staiger ◽  
Kathleen B. Harris ◽  
Dennis Borochovitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Wire Localization ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Occult Breast Cancer ◽  
Imaging Detection

scholarly journals A Meta-analysis of the Association Between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Surgical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Li Xie ◽  
Zhi-Hong Xu ◽  
Deng-Hui Wei ◽  
Chun-Sen Xu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Conservation Rate ◽  
Excision Rate

IntroductionThe use of preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer has been increasing. However, the value of MRI applied to the women with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, this study focused on the association between preoperative MRI and surgical outcomes, which include mastectom y rate, breast conservation rate, and re-excision rate.Material and methodsA systematic literature search was performed by the Wan fang, VIP (Chinese biomedical databases), PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Vip databases. The keywords were "breast cancer", "magnetic resonance imaging", "mastectomy rate", "re-excision rate", and "breast conservation rate." A random-effects model was used to estimate the proportion of women with various outcomes in the MRI group, versus a non-MRI group. The odds ratio (OR) for each surgical outcome were calculated.Results4 RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trial) met the eligibility criteria that included a total of 2312 patients with breast cancer. The analysis results of the MRI group versus the non-MRI group were as follows: Mastectomy rate of 15% versus 10%, OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.79-5.11, P=0.14; Breast conservation rate 84% versus 89%, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.29-1.17, P=0.13; Re-excision rate 17% versus 19%, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37-1.54, P=0.45.ConclusionsThere was no significant association between preoperative MRI and surgical outcomes. This study suggested that the use of preoperative MRI should be selective. The results showed that the application of preoperative MRI didn’t improve the prognosis of breast cancer patients. More randomized trials are needed for further study due to limited randomized trials.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Comparison With Luminal and HER2-Overexpressing Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melania Costantini ◽  
Paolo Belli ◽  
Daniela Distefano ◽  
Enida Bufi ◽  
Marialuisa Di Matteo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Resonance Imaging

scholarly journals Breast cancer and background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Hu ◽  
Jinghao Zhao ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Quanshui Fu ◽  
Linwei Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Background ◽  
Background Parenchymal Enhancement ◽  
Breast Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Parenchymal Enhancement

Abstract Background The background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging use to predict breast cancer attracts many searchers to draw a possible relationship. However, the results of their relationships were conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to assess breast cancer frequency associations with background parenchymal enhancement. Methods A systematic literature search up to January 2020 was performed to detect studies recording associations between breast cancer frequency and background parenchymal enhancement. We found thirteen studies including 13,788 women at the start with 4046 breast cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between breast cancer frequency and background parenchymal enhancement by the dichotomous technique with a random or fixed-effect model. Results Women with minimal or mild background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging did not have any risk of breast cancer compared to control women (OR, 1.20; 95% CI 0.54–2.67). However, high background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 2.66; 95% CI 1.36–5.19) and moderate (OR, 2.51; 95% CI 1.49–4.21) was associated with a significantly higher rate of breast cancer frequency compared to control women. Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that the women with high and moderate background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging have higher risks, up to 2.66 fold, of breast cancer. We suggest that women with high or moderate background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging to be scheduled for more frequent follow-up and screening for breast cancer to avoid any complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document