Colonization patterns and impacts of the invasive amphipods Chelicorophium curvispinum and Dikerogammarus villosus in the IJsselmeer area, The Netherlands

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2067-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruurd Noordhuis ◽  
John van Schie ◽  
Nico Jaarsma
Author(s):  
Eddy Lammens ◽  
Francien van Luijn ◽  
Yolanda Wessels ◽  
Harry Bouwhuis ◽  
Ruurd Noordhuis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 662-684
Author(s):  
Louisa Wood ◽  
Emily Smith ◽  
Jamie Bojko ◽  
Paul Stebbing

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 599 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy Lammens ◽  
Francien van Luijn ◽  
Yolanda Wessels ◽  
Harry Bouwhuis ◽  
Ruurd Noordhuis ◽  
...  

NeoBiota ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 51-74
Author(s):  
Jarosław Kobak ◽  
Michał Rachalewski ◽  
Karolina Bącela-Spychalska

We used a freshwater amphipod-microsporidian model (Ponto-Caspian hosts: Dikerogammarus villosus and D. haemobaphes, parasite: Cucumispora dikerogammari) to check whether parasites affect biological invasions by modulating behaviour and intra- and interspecific interactions between the invaders. We tested competition for shelter in conspecific and heterospecific male pairs (one or both individuals infected or non-infected). In general, amphipods of both species increased their shelter occupancy time when accompanied by infected rather than non-infected conspecifics and heterospecifics. Infected amphipods faced lower aggression from non-infected conspecifics. Moreover, D. villosus was more aggressive than D. haemobaphes and more aggressive towards conspecifics vs. heterospecifics. In summary, infection reduced the intra- and interspecific competitivity of amphipods, which became less capable of defending their shelters, despite their unchanged need for shelter occupancy. Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, commonly considered as a weaker competitor, displaced by D. villosus from co-occupied locations, was able to compete efficiently for the shelter with D. villosus when microsporidian infections appeared on the scene. This suggests that parasites may be important mediators of biological invasions, facilitating the existence of large intra- and interspecific assemblages of invasive alien amphipods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Warren ◽  
Stephanie J. Bradbeer ◽  
Alison M. Dunn

AbstractInvasive alien species negatively impact upon biodiversity and generate significant economic costs worldwide. Globally, amphibians have suffered considerable losses, with a key driver being predation by large invasive invertebrate and vertebrate predators. However, there is no research regarding the potential ecological impact of small invertebrate invaders. The invasive freshwater amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus can act as a top predator capable of displacing native amphipods and preying heavily upon a range of native species. Listed as one of Europe’s top 100 worst invaders, D. villosus has significantly restructured freshwater communities across western Europe and is expected to invade North America in the near future. Here we explore the ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon UK native and invasive amphibians (Rana temporaria and Xenopus laevis respectively) using the “Relative Impact Potential” (RIP) metric. By combining estimations of per capita effects (i.e. functional response; FR) and relative field abundances, we apply the RIP metric to quantify the potential ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon embryonic and larval amphibian prey, compared to the native amphipod Gammarus pulex. Both native and invasive amphipods consumed early-stage amphibians and exhibited potentially destabilising Type II FRs. However, larger body size in invasive D. villosus translated into a superior FR through significantly lower handling times and subsequently higher maximum feeding rates—up to seven times greater than native G. pulex. Higher invader abundance also drove elevated RIP scores for invasive D. villosus, with potential impact scores predicted up to 15.4 times greater than native G. pulex. Overall, D. villosus is predicted to have a greater predatory impact upon amphibian populations than G. pulex, due primarily to its larger body size and superior field abundance, potentially reducing amphibian recruitment within invaded regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document