Sixteen years follow-up results of a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in stage III breast cancer: GOCS experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Pablo Leone ◽  
Julieta Leone ◽  
Carlos Teodoro Vallejo ◽  
Juan Eduardo Pérez ◽  
Alberto Omar Romero ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11118-11118
Author(s):  
Julieta Leone ◽  
Jose Pablo Leone ◽  
Carlos Teodoro Vallejo ◽  
Juan Eduardo Perez ◽  
Alberto Omar Romero ◽  
...  

11118 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment in stage III breast cancer. Prognostic factors can help to identify patients (pts) with high risk of recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess several prognostic factors after a long follow-up, in stage III breast cancer pts, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We evaluated 126 pts with stage III breast cancer that participated in a phase-II randomized trial of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC every 21 days) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF days 1 and 8 every 28). Chemotherapy was administered for three cycles prior to definitive surgery and radiotherapy, and then for six cycles as adjuvant. Response was assessed by WHO criteria. Results: The median age was 52 years (range 24-75). Median follow-up was 4.5 years (range 0.2-16.4), disease free survival (DFS) 4.8 years and overall survival (OS) 6.4 years. Results of the phase-II study showed no difference in efficacy between groups. Univariate analysis showed that the number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (pLN), pathologic response and estrogen and progesterone receptor status correlated with DFS and OS. Number of pLN was the only prognostic factor with statistical significance in Cox regression test for both, DFS and OS (P=0.0004 and P=0.0006, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of pts with pLN, we found no difference in survival when we compared FAC with CMF. Conclusions: The prolonged follow-up of this study provides a unique opportunity to evaluate factors that predict long-term outcomes. After 16 years of follow-up, the number of pLN remains the most powerful predictor of survival. The subset of pts with pLN had similar survival regardless of the regimen used. Clinical trial information: NCT00002696.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1073-1073
Author(s):  
Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger ◽  
Julieta Leone ◽  
Carlos Teodoro Vallejo ◽  
Juan Eduardo Perez ◽  
Alberto Omar Romero ◽  
...  

1073 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows direct evaluation of the tumor’s sensitivity to therapy, eradication of micrometastatic disease and the possibility of performing breast conserving surgery. The aim of this study was to describe long-term results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancer patients (pts). Methods: We evaluated 126 pts with stage III breast cancer that participated in a phase-II randomized trial of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC every 21 days) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF days 1 and 8 every 28). Chemotherapy was administered for three cycles prior to definitive surgery and radiotherapy, and then for six cycles as adjuvant. Response was assessed by WHO criteria. Results: Pts characteristics were well balanced in both groups (FAC: 64pts, CMF: 62pts). Median follow-up was 4.5 years (range 0.2-16.4). No significant difference was found regarding acute and long-term toxicity; however, alopecia was more frequent in FAC group. Breast conserving surgery was performed in 13.5% of pts with no difference between groups. Objective response rate (OR) was similar in both groups but pathological complete response was achieved by 4 pts who received FAC. Although both groups had similar locoregional and distant recurrences, contralateral breast cancer was higher in the CMF group (6.5% vs 1.6%, P=NS). Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data are shown in the table. After 16 years of follow-up, 42.1% (n=53) of pts are still alive. Disease progression was the principal cause of death in both groups (78.9% vs 84.2%). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report long-term outcomes of FAC and CMF in the neoadjuvant setting. Within the sensitivity of our study, both regimens showed similar OR, long-term toxicity, DFS and OS rate at 16 years. Around 40% of pts are currently alive. Clinical trial information: NCT00002696. [Table: see text]


2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth M. O'Regan ◽  
Jamie H. Von Roenn ◽  
Robert W. Carlson ◽  
Ummekalsoom Malik ◽  
Joseph A. Sparano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document