scholarly journals Second primary breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: 10-year cumulative incidence in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

2015 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tehillah S. Menes ◽  
Mary Beth Terry ◽  
David Goldgar ◽  
Irene L. Andrulis ◽  
Julia A. Knight ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Neuhausen ◽  
◽  
Hilmi Ozcelik ◽  
Melissa C. Southey ◽  
Esther M. John ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (34) ◽  
pp. 4505-4509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Gail D. Gong ◽  
Esther M. John ◽  
David A. Johnston ◽  
Anna Felberg ◽  
...  

Purpose Women with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have five- to 20-fold increased risks of developing breast and ovarian cancer. A recent study claimed that women testing negative for their family-specific BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (noncarriers) have a five-fold increased risk of breast cancer. We estimated breast cancer risks for noncarriers by using a population-based sample of patients with breast cancer and their female first-degree relatives (FDRs). Patients and Methods Patients were women with breast cancer and their FDRs enrolled in the population-based component of the Breast Cancer Family Registry; patients with breast cancer were tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, as were FDRs of identified mutation carriers. We used segregation analysis to fit a model that accommodates familial correlation in breast cancer risk due to unobserved shared risk factors. Results We studied 3,047 families; 160 had BRCA1 and 132 had BRCA2 mutations. There was no evidence of increased breast cancer risk for noncarriers of identified mutations compared with FDRs from families without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: relative risk was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.04 to 3.81). Residual breast cancer correlation within families was strong, suggesting substantial risk heterogeneity in women without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, with some 3.4% of them accounting for roughly one third of breast cancer cases. Conclusion These results support the practice of advising noncarriers that they do not have any increase in breast cancer risk attributable to the family-specific BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S75
Author(s):  
A. Heemskerk-Gerritsen ◽  
M. Hooning ◽  
M.M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst ◽  
A. Jager ◽  
C.H.M. van Deurzen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1509-1509
Author(s):  
B. E. Kiely ◽  
M. A. Jenkins ◽  
J. M. McKinley ◽  
M. L. Friedlander ◽  
P. C. Weideman ◽  
...  

1509 Background: Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) reduces contralateral breast cancer (BC) risk by up to 97%. Few studies have examined the prevalence and predictors of CRRM in BC patients at high familial risk of a second primary BC. Methods: Participants were women with unilateral BC and a strong family history of the disease, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Data were collected by interview, self-administered questionnaire, and review of pathology and surgical reports. Associations between having CRRM and potential predictors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 1018 study participants (median follow-up 5.5 years), 154 (15%) underwent CRRM. The median time from initial BC to CRRM was 1 year. More likely to undergo CRRM were women who were younger at the time of their BC diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.94 per year of age, p < 0.001), those diagnosed more recently (OR = 1.16 per calendar year, p < 0.001), those who underwent mastectomy rather than breast conservation as their initial definitive BC treatment (OR = 5.2, p < 0.001) and those who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (OR = 3.4, p < 0.001). BRCA1/2 mutation status and tumor characteristics were not independently associated with CRRM uptake. A contralateral BC event occurred in 177 (20.5%) of the 864 women who did not have CRRM, compared with one chest wall event (0.6%) in the 154 women post-CRRM. Conclusions: Younger women with more recently diagnosed BC treated with mastectomy were most likely to elect CRRM. BRCA1/2 mutation status and the competing risk of BC recurrence and death did not appear to influence decision making. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Koskenvuo ◽  
C. Svarvar ◽  
S. Suominen ◽  
K. Aittomäki ◽  
T. Jahkola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document