A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Interventions for Adolescents with Depression and Suicide Related Behaviors in Low and Middle Income Countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 954-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarantsetseg Davaasambuu ◽  
Hamid Phillip ◽  
Arun Ravindran ◽  
Peter Szatmari
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract P681: Implementation of Stroke Prevention Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Ryan ◽  
Vida Rebello ◽  
Desiree Gutierrez ◽  
Kameko Washburn ◽  
Alvaro Zevallos Barboza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Community Based Interventions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death globally and an increasing concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where, due to limited capacity to treat stroke, preventative efforts are critically important. Although some research on evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention in LMIC exists, there remains a significant gap in understanding of their implementation across various contexts in LMIC. Objectives: In this scoping review, our objective was to identify and synthesize the implementation outcomes (using Proctor et al.’s taxonomy, 2011) for stroke prevention interventions, as well as to describe the diverse interventions employed. Methods: Eligible studies were empirical, focused on implementation of stroke prevention programs or policies, and occurred in at least one LMIC. Five databases were searched, including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for selection and charted data; discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer until consensus was reached. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze and interpret the findings. Results: Studies were predominantly focused in Asia, targeting primary or secondary prevention, and facility-based. Interventions were conducted at the level of individual (n=11), system (n=12), or both (n=4). Various implementation outcomes were reported, most commonly cost (n=10), acceptability (n=7), fidelity (n=7), and feasibility (n=6), but also adoption (n=4), penetration (n=3), appropriateness (n=1), and sustainability (n=1). Conclusions: Findings highlight the breadth of evidence-based interventions for stroke prevention available to implement in LMIC settings, including culturally acceptable education interventions, cost-effective medications, and community-based interventions implemented by community health workers. Implementation outcomes remain under-reported, and more rigorous research is needed to better plan and evaluate the implementation of these interventions to prevent stroke.

Abstract P723: Adaptation of Stroke Prevention Interventions for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessa Ryan ◽  
Kameko Washburn ◽  
Vida Rebello ◽  
Desiree Gutierrez ◽  
Hector Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Risk Factor Modification ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of mortality globally, with 85% of stroke death occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Translation of evidence-based stroke prevention interventions from their original setting to the novel context in which they will be implemented is often unreported; especially in LMICs where it has been severely understudied. Thus, our objective was to investigate how adaptation has been examined within research on stroke prevention interventions in LMICs through a scoping review of the available literature in order to highlight benefits and best-practices, identify gaps, and develop a greater understanding of these efforts that will ultimately support attempts to address the global burden of stroke. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science), for eligible studies using a search strategy developed in consultation with a research librarian. Two reviewers independently assessed the retrieved articles for selection based on the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed empirical papers or protocols, reported on adaptation of stroke prevention interventions, and occurred in at least one LMIC) through a two phase process consisting of (1) title and abstract screening and (2) full-text screening. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. Data were charted and a narrative synthesis, guided by the FRAME framework, was used to analyze and interpret the findings. Results: Of 380 articles retrieved, a total of six articles reporting adaptation of primary (n=4) or secondary (n=2) stroke prevention interventions in LMICs were identified. Types of interventions included use of community health workers (n = 2), use of mHealth tools (n=2), and interventions aimed at risk factor modification (n = 2). Adaptations were proactively planned, with multiple adaptation goals reported. Conclusions: This is the first review of its kind to focus on adaptation of evidence-based stroke prevention interventions in LMICs. Through our systematic investigation, we highlight the need for additional research to assess the processes and outcomes of stroke prevention interventions.

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Guidelines for Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Summary of WHO Recommendations

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e1001122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Dua ◽  
Corrado Barbui ◽  
Nicolas Clark ◽  
Alexandra Fleischmann ◽  
Vladimir Poznyak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Substance Use Disorders ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract WP418: A Systematic Comparison of Key Features of Ischaemic Stroke Prevention Guidelines in Low- and Middle-income vs High-income Countries

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernan O Bayona ◽  
Mayowa Owolabi ◽  
Wayne Feng ◽  
James R Sawers ◽  
Paul Olowoyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
High Income ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Prevention Guideline ◽  
Prevention Guidelines ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Introduction: Implementation of contextually appropriate, evidence-based, expert-recommended stroke prevention guideline is particularly important in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), which bear disproportional larger burden of stroke while possessing fewer resources. Focus therefore, should be on approaches enabling healthcare systems to improve control of vascular risk factors. Objective: We aimed to compare important features of stroke prevention guidelines between LMICs and High Income Countries (HICs). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, AJOL, SciELO, and LILACS databases for stroke prevention guidelines published between January 2005 and December 2015 by country. Primary search items included: “Stroke” and “Guidelines”. We critically appraised the articles for evidence level, issuance frequency and implementation aspects to clinical practice. Results: Among 45 stroke prevention guidelines published, 28 (62%) met eligibility criteria: 7 from LMICs (25%) and 21 from HICs (75%). LMIC-issued guidelines were less likely to have conflict of interest declarations (57% vs. 100%, p=0.01), involve high quality systematic reviews (57% vs. 95%, p= 0.03), had good dissemination channels (14% vs 71%, p=0.02). The patient views and preferences were the most significant stakeholder considerations in HICs (43%, p=0.04) compared with LMICs. Conclusion: The quality and quantity of stroke prevention guidelines in LMICs are less than those of HICs and need to be significantly improved upon.

scholarly journals EXAMINING THE DOUBLE BURDEN OF MALNUTRITION FOR PRESCHOOL CHILDREN AND WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: A SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Mulimba Were ◽  
SAVERIO STRANGES ◽  
Ishor Sharma ◽  
Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalez ◽  
M. Karen Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Preschool Children ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
World Health ◽  
Women Of Reproductive Age ◽  
Double Burden ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Double Burden Of Malnutrition ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Introduction: The majority of the populations in Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are encountering the double burden of malnutrition (DBM): the coexistence of both undernutrition and overnutrition sequalae. With DBM being a new phenomenon in research, little is known about its etiology, operational definitions and risk factors influencing its manifestation. The proposed scoping review is aimed at mapping literature with regards to the DBM phenomenon among preschool children and women of reproductive age in LMICs who are among the most high-risk groups to encounter DBM. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS and ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Global. Additionally, searches in other government and institutional sources (World Health Organization website and university repositories) and forward and backward citation tracking of seminal articles will also be done. Two reviewers will independently conduct title and abstract screening and full text screening. Similarly, data extraction and coding will independently be done by two reviewers. Information extracted from included literature will be analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis approach and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this study because the review is based on literature from publicly available sources. The dissemination of our findings will be done through presentations in relevant conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document