A Call for Hope-Centered Work: A Preliminary Study of Oncology Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Role and Value of Hope at End-of-Life

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-307
Author(s):  
Meredith Hemphill Ruden
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Cindy Davis ◽  
Karen Kayser ◽  
Tamara Cadet

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Cathy Berkman

Abstract As the population ages and more people live longer with chronic and life-limiting illnesses, more healthcare professionals with palliative care skills are needed. Social workers are part of the palliative care team, but there is little, if any, content on palliative and end-of-life care in MSW programs. A 24-minute video featuring nine palliative and hospice social workers was produced with two goals: 1) increase knowledge of social work students about palliative and end-of-life care; and 2) interest social work students in a career in palliative social work. MSW students from three schools, in NY and Alabama, viewed the video. After viewing the video, 94 students participated in the mixed methods study, completing the brief, anonymous, online survey. The mean level of understanding about what palliative social workers do, rated from 1 (no understanding) to 5 (very good understanding), was 2.96 (SD=.99) before viewing the video and 4.31 (SD=.61) after, for an increase of 1.35 points (95% CI=1.14, 1.55) (p<.001). The mean level of interest in a career in palliative care social work and working with seriously ill persons and their family members, rated from 1 (Not at all interested) to 5 (Extremely interested), was 2.52 (SD=.99) before viewing the video and 3.45 SD=.80) after, for an increase of .91 points (95% CI=.79, 1.07) (p<.001). Qualitative data supporting the quantitative findings will be presented. This study suggests that a video intervention may be an effective tool to increase knowledge and interest in palliative and end-of-life care among social work students.


Author(s):  
Kelly Tsz Ching Wong ◽  
Amy Yin Man Chow ◽  
Iris Kwan Ning Chan

Background: There is a growing need for palliative care for patients near the end of life and their caregivers. Palliative and end-of-life care (EoLC) education are recommended for all health care (e.g., physicians, nurses, and allied health practitioners) and social care professionals (e.g., social workers) to ensure the quality of services. However, less attention has been afforded to generic, in contrast to specialized, EoLC education. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a series of short-term generic EoLC educational programs for health and social care professionals. Method: A pre-post survey design was adopted, focusing on different EoLC core competences. Results: Significant improvement was observed in all perceived competences after the educational programs, regardless of participants’ occupation or EoLC experience. Perceived competence in self-care was rated significantly higher than all other competences prior to the programs. Healthcare professionals rated significantly higher on competence in symptom management than social workers. Scores on communication skill and self-care competences were significantly higher following longer (i.e., 16-24 hours) than shorter (i.e., 4-8 hours) programs. Conclusion: Generalist palliative/EoLC educational programs may enable health and social care professionals to refresh and extend their knowledge and skills and enhance their perceived competence in providing EoLC. Further research on generalist palliative/EoLC education is needed to examine the impact of continuing training on professionals’ actual practice in EoLC and palliative care.


Pained ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
Michael D. Stein ◽  
Sandro Galea

This chapter assesses palliative care. Palliative care focuses on improving the quality of life for people with life-threatening illnesses by involving a team of nurses, doctors, social workers, and clergy in a care plan. Hospice care—administered in dedicated units and in services delivered at home—has been slowly expanding over the past two decades, but the increasing percentage of patients who use hospice for less than 7 days suggests that the full benefits of end-of-life palliative care are not being realized. Meanwhile, the use of unwanted, aggressive end-of-life care, often inconsistent with patient preferences, remains pervasive. For palliative care to be effective, it must be supported by government policies and insurer incentives; it must also be owned by communities, which must continue to ask for help in designing and paying for high-quality palliative care for patients and their caregiving families.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke Bekkema ◽  
Anke J.E. de Veer ◽  
Gwenda Albers ◽  
Cees M.P.M. Hertogh ◽  
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1426-1433
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Kimura ◽  
Miki Hosoya ◽  
Kyoko Toju ◽  
Chikako Shimizu ◽  
Tatsuya Morita

Abstract Objective The objectives of this study were to identify barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients and their families as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing (hereafter, collectively referred to as ‘nurses’) and medical social workers, as well as to clarify their opinions about effective strategies to facilitate end-of-life discussion. Methods A questionnaire survey was distributed to 4354 medical professionals working at 402 designated regional cancer hospitals in Japan. Responses were obtained from 494 oncologists (valid response rate 30.7%), 993 nurses (46.7%) and 387 medical social workers (48.1%). Results Among the barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients, factors related to patients and families, such as ‘Family members’ difficulty accepting loved one’s poor prognosis’, were recognized as the most important issues, which was the common view shared across the three types of medical professionals who participated in this study. Nurses and medical social workers were significantly more likely than oncologists to recognize as important issues ‘Health care team disagreement about goals of care’ and ‘Lack of training to have conversations for end-of-life discussion’. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, ‘providing mental and emotional support for the patients and their families after end-of-life discussion’ was needed most as perceived by the respondents regardless of their profession. Conclusions Barriers impeding end-of-life discussion were factors related to patients and their families, and oncologists’ close cooperation with nurses and medical social workers is important in providing emotional support for patients and families. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, it is important to share information on patients’ prognosis and goals for treatment among oncologists and other medical professionals, as well as strengthen communication skill of these medical professions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document