scholarly journals Trophic Niche Segregation in the Nilotic Ichthyofauna of Lake Albert (Uganda, Africa)

2005 ◽  
Vol 74 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 247-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Campbell ◽  
Sylvester B. Wandera ◽  
Robert J. Thacker ◽  
D. George Dixon ◽  
Robert E. Hecky
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey M. Kingsbury ◽  
Bronwyn M. Gillanders ◽  
David J. Booth ◽  
Ivan Nagelkerken

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Russo ◽  
D. Pulcini ◽  
Á. O’Leary ◽  
S. Cataudella ◽  
S. Mariani

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe López Juri ◽  
Sergio Naretto ◽  
Ana Carolina Mateos ◽  
Margarita Chiaraviglio ◽  
Gabriela Cardozo

Diversity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
Wen Jing Li ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Huan Zhang Liu ◽  
Wen Xuan Cao

Species coexistence is one of the most important concepts in ecology for understanding how biodiversity is shaped and changed. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which two small cyprinid fishes (H. leucisculus and H. bleekeri) coexist by analyzing their niche segregation and morphological differences in the upper Yangtze River. Morphological analysis indicated that H. leucisculus has posteriorly located dorsal fins, whereas H. bleekeri has a more slender body, bigger eyes, longer anal fin base, and a higher head. Niche segregation analysis showed spatial and trophic niche segregation between these two species: on the spatial scale, H. leucisculus was more widely distributed than H. bleekeri, indicating that H. leucisculus is more of a generalist in the spatial dimension; on the trophic scale, H. bleekeri had a wider niche than H. leucisculus. Therefore, these two species adopt different adaptation mechanisms to coexist


Hydrobiologia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 829 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo C. Andrade ◽  
Daniel B. Fitzgerald ◽  
Kirk O. Winemiller ◽  
Priscilla S. Barbosa ◽  
Tommaso Giarrizzo

Author(s):  
Bárbara Angélio Quirino ◽  
Franco Teixeira de Mello ◽  
Sabrina Deosti ◽  
Claudia Costa Bonecker ◽  
Ana Lúcia Paz Cardozo ◽  
...  

Abstract Habitat complexity is recognized to mediate predator–prey relationships by offering refuge or not. We investigated the availability of planktonic microcrustaceans and the diet of a planktivorous fish (Hyphessobrycon eques) at different levels (low, intermediate and high) of aquatic macrophyte biomass. Sampling was carried out in a river with low flow speed, located in a Neotropical floodplain. We collected fish and microcrustaceans in macrophyte stands with variations in biomass. There were no differences in microcrustacean density in the water among the levels of macrophyte biomass, but microcrustacean richness and diet composition of H. eques differed. Microcrustacean richness and trophic niche breadth of the planktivorous fish were higher in high biomass stands. There was high consumption of a small cladoceran species in low macrophyte biomass, which was replaced by larger species, such as copepods, in intermediate and high biomass. Thus, the selection of some species was different among the biomass levels. These results suggest that plant biomass plays an important role in the interaction between fish and microcrustaceans, and prey characteristics such as size, escape ability and energy value make them more or less subject to predation by fish according to habitat structuring.


Author(s):  
Sara Vásquez-Castillo ◽  
Iván A. Hinojosa ◽  
Nicole Colin ◽  
Aldo A. Poblete ◽  
Konrad Górski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document