Relationship between body shape and trophic niche segregation in two closely related sympatric fishes

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Russo ◽  
D. Pulcini ◽  
Á. O’Leary ◽  
S. Cataudella ◽  
S. Mariani
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey M. Kingsbury ◽  
Bronwyn M. Gillanders ◽  
David J. Booth ◽  
Ivan Nagelkerken

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe López Juri ◽  
Sergio Naretto ◽  
Ana Carolina Mateos ◽  
Margarita Chiaraviglio ◽  
Gabriela Cardozo

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Consuelo M. Aguilar-Betancourt ◽  
Gaspar González-Sansón ◽  
Juan R. Flores-Ortega ◽  
Daniel Kosonoy-Aceves ◽  
Gabriela Lucano-Ramírez ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The main goal of this research was to investigate the differences in diet composition among three species of the genus Lutjanus inhabiting a coastal lagoon as juveniles. The working hypothesis was that these species feed on a common base of food resources and therefore, some niche overlap is present in terms of general diet composition. However, changes in the trophic niche with size and differences in some morphological traits among species explain observed differences in diet. Fish were collected during 42 sampling trips conducted regularly from February 2011 to January 2012 using several types of fishing gear. Total number of analyzed stomachs was 288 for Lutjanus argentiventris from 2.3 to 19.9 cm total length (TL); 178 for Lutjanus colorado ranging from 2.4 to 30.1 cm TL; and 183 for Lutjanus novemfasciatus with 1.2 to 20.0 cm TL. Results indicate that juveniles of all three lutjanid species share a general diet based on decapods and fishes. However, L. novemfasciatus has a more piscivorous habit, which can be explained by a more slender body shape and larger teeth, characteristics, which increase fish catching performance. Larger fish of all three species eat larger prey, which is consistent with the optimum foraging theory.


Diversity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
Wen Jing Li ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Huan Zhang Liu ◽  
Wen Xuan Cao

Species coexistence is one of the most important concepts in ecology for understanding how biodiversity is shaped and changed. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which two small cyprinid fishes (H. leucisculus and H. bleekeri) coexist by analyzing their niche segregation and morphological differences in the upper Yangtze River. Morphological analysis indicated that H. leucisculus has posteriorly located dorsal fins, whereas H. bleekeri has a more slender body, bigger eyes, longer anal fin base, and a higher head. Niche segregation analysis showed spatial and trophic niche segregation between these two species: on the spatial scale, H. leucisculus was more widely distributed than H. bleekeri, indicating that H. leucisculus is more of a generalist in the spatial dimension; on the trophic scale, H. bleekeri had a wider niche than H. leucisculus. Therefore, these two species adopt different adaptation mechanisms to coexist


2017 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 84-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Ventura ◽  
Vincent Bonhomme ◽  
Paolo Colangelo ◽  
Andrea Bonifazi ◽  
Giovanna Jona Lasinio ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline V. R. Prado ◽  
◽  
Erivelto Goulart ◽  
João P. A. Pagotto ◽  
◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Based on the form-function interaction and its consequence to niche exploitation by fish species, the study aimed to identify ecomorphological patterns and to investigate the possibility of explaining the trophic niche breadth using the pattern of intraspecific ecomorphological diversity. We tested the following hypotheses: i) the morphology explains variations in diet among fish species; ii) the intraspecific ecomorphological diversity is related to the breadth of the trophic niche explored by the species, so that species that feed on a wider range of resources have greater variation in body shape compared to those specialized in resource consumption. Fish were collected in stands of the aquatic macrophytes Eichhornia azurea and Eichhornia crassipes in lentic environments of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Two major trends were observed in the morphological space: fish with body shapes adapted to explore the substrate and others with a design that facilitates the capture of food items in more structured habitats. The relationship of diet with body shape was confirmed by significant relationships between matrices of trophic and morphological distances, providing evidence that morphology is related to interspecific variations in the use of trophic resources. However, the ranges of morphological and intraspecific trophic variations were not significantly related, rejecting the second hypothesis about the relationship between intraspecific ecomorphological diversity and trophic niche breadth. The morphological characteristics often have multiple ecological roles, which could result in trade-off among these functions. Thus, fish with highly specialized morphology may show specialist feeding or even generalist habit, because in this case some resources may be difficult to exploit, even by a specialist. Species with low and high morphological diversity demonstrated narrow trophic niche and the availability of resources may have been essential for consumption. Therefore, species morphology is related to the use of food resources and ecomorphology can be considered an important tool for the prediction of the exploited niche space by species in assemblages. However it is not possible to predict if species with greater intraspecific morphological diversification indeed have wider niche, since the abundance or scarcity of the available food resources may interfere with trophic niche breadth.


Hydrobiologia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 829 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo C. Andrade ◽  
Daniel B. Fitzgerald ◽  
Kirk O. Winemiller ◽  
Priscilla S. Barbosa ◽  
Tommaso Giarrizzo

2005 ◽  
Vol 74 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 247-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Campbell ◽  
Sylvester B. Wandera ◽  
Robert J. Thacker ◽  
D. George Dixon ◽  
Robert E. Hecky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document