Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building

2010 ◽  
Vol 176 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 501-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radha Goyal ◽  
Mukesh Khare
1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 461-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Özkaynak ◽  
P.B. Ryan ◽  
G.A. Allen ◽  
W.A. Turner

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen F. Tieskens ◽  
Chad W. Milando ◽  
Lindsay J. Underhill ◽  
Kimberly Vermeer ◽  
Jonathan I. Levy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric asthma is currently the most prevalent chronic disease in the United States, with children in lower income families disproportionately affected. This increased health burden is partly due to lower-quality and insufficient maintenance of affordable housing. A movement towards ‘green’ retrofits that improve energy efficiency and increase ventilation in existing affordable housing offers an opportunity to provide cost-effective interventions that can address these health disparities. Methods We combine indoor air quality modeling with a previously developed discrete event model for pediatric asthma exacerbation to simulate the effects of different types of energy retrofits implemented at an affordable housing site in Boston, MA. Results Simulation results show that retrofits lead to overall better health outcomes and healthcare cost savings if reduced air exchange due to energy-saving air tightening is compensated by mechanical ventilation. Especially when exposed to indoor tobacco smoke and intensive gas-stove cooking such retrofit would lead to an average annual cost saving of over USD 200, while without mechanical ventilation the same children would have experienced an increase of almost USD 200/year in health care utilization cost. Conclusion The combination of indoor air quality modeling and discrete event modeling applied in this paper can allow for the inclusion of health impacts in cost-benefit analyses of proposed affordable housing energy retrofits.


Author(s):  
Preston McNall ◽  
George Walton ◽  
Samuel Silberstein ◽  
James Axley ◽  
Kunimichi Ishiguro ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-142
Author(s):  
Andrea Ferrantelli ◽  
Camilla Vornanen-Winqvist ◽  
Milla Mattila ◽  
Heidi Salonen ◽  
Jarek Kurnitski

Moisture excess in buildings constitutes a complex problem affecting indoor air quality, energy consumption and the lifetime of the building envelope. We investigate the effect on moisture transfer in structures as a positive pressure is applied inside the enclosure. It is found that, contrary to established belief, the positive pressure does not induce any negative effects on the structures’ moisture content in normally ventilated classrooms, even with high occupancy. Our case study consists of a school building in Finland, subject to temperature and relative humidity measurements after a small (5–7 Pa) positive pressure was realized through ventilation control. We first address analytically the moisture excess generated inside the classrooms for 14 days, using dynamical balance equations that account for both ventilation effects and occupants’ moisture release in the environment. It is found that the average moisture excess is very small, largely below 1 g/m3, even for ventilation rates that are half the design value. We also examine the moisture performance of the envelope, by addressing the moisture migration at upper and lower joints of the external walls for both measured and design values of the indoor absolute humidity (AH). A coupled numerical model of diffusion and convection shows that moisture accumulation in the envelope and the according stresses are negligible for any realistic AH values. This result is in agreement with field measurements at the school. In conclusion, it seems that applying a small overpressure in a well-ventilated school building during a standard service period resulted in no accumulation inside the external walls, even at high occupancy and with low ventilation. Remarkably, it slightly dried out the moisture content in structures under actual occupancy conditions. The positive pressure has accordingly no negative effects on moisture performance, and is capable to guarantee a good indoor air quality as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document