Measuring the environmental impact of waste flow management in Brazilian apartment buildings

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Fehr
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2898
Author(s):  
Rakhyun Kim ◽  
Myung-Kwan Lim ◽  
Seungjun Roh ◽  
Won-Jun Park

This study analyzed the characteristics of the environmental impacts of apartment buildings, a typical housing type in South Korea, as part of a research project supporting the streamlined life cycle assessment (S-LCA) of buildings within the G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) framework. Three recently built apartment building complexes were chosen as study objects for the quantitative evaluation of the buildings in terms of their embodied environmental impacts (global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone layer depletion potential, photochemical oxidant creation potential, and abiotic depletion potential), using the LCA approach. Additionally, we analyzed the emission trends according to the cut-off criteria of the six environmental impact categories by performing an S-LCA with cut-off criteria 90–99% of the cumulative weight percentile. Consequently, we were able to present the cut-off criterion best suited for S-LCA and analyze the effect of the cut-off criteria on the environmental impact analysis results. A comprehensive environmental impact analysis of the characteristics of the six environmental impact categories revealed that the error rate was below 5% when the cut-off criterion of 97.5% of the cumulative weight percentile was applied, thus verifying its validity as the optimal cut-off criterion for S-LCA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-455
Author(s):  
Patrick Caton ◽  
Howard Ernst ◽  
Karen Flack ◽  
Joseph Smith ◽  
Kurtis Swope

Municipal solid waste flow was modeled and measured at the U.S. Naval Academy to understand not only the movement of waste, but also the policies and economic incentives that have led to the current waste management plan at the Academy. The study contains four primary thrusts: regulatory policies, waste production and recycling levels, collection and sorting processes, and disposal and material recovery. Waste hauling data for a one-year period in 2017-2018 showed that the institution generated approximately 300 tons of total waste each month and recycled approximately 11-15% of that waste. From directly measuring waste across campus, approximately 36% of the non-recyclable waste stream contains recyclable materials. Most recyclable materials that ended up in the non-recyclable waste stream were plastics and cans, and came from academic spaces. However, a test academic space that gave access to waste bins only conjoined with recycling bins showed a substantial reduction in recycling infiltrating the non-recyclable waste stream. The study also shows how the handling of waste has evolved over recent years. Since the mid-2000s, the Academy has shifted to relying on contractors to sort and transport waste. Currently, five private contracting agencies are utilized in the waste flow stream after materials leave the Academy. To assess environmental impact, a life cycle assessment model was constructed based on the movement of waste to estimate the possible effects of the current recycling program on carbon equivalent emissions. The results indicate that current practices result in over 500 metric tons of carbon equivalent savings over the long-term during the one-year measurement period. The model also shows that by reducing recycling infiltrates into the waste stream, an additional 1000 metric tons of carbon equivalent savings are possible. Economic incentives were evaluated at each of the four sections of the waste process model, and analysis suggests that focusing on behavioral change strategies at the waste generation and initial collection and sorting levels holds the best promise for increasing levels of recycling, reducing landfilled waste, and reducing net carbon emissions in accordance with DOD policy goals.


2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantinos A. Balaras ◽  
Kalliopi Droutsa ◽  
Elena Dascalaki ◽  
Simon Kontoyiannidis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hänsel ◽  
T Bambach ◽  
H Wachtel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document