Generation means analysis of wheat streak mosaic virus resistance in winter wheat

Euphytica ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Hakizimana ◽  
Amir M.H. Ibrahim ◽  
Marie A.C. Langham ◽  
Jackie C. Rudd ◽  
Scott D. Haley
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasdeep S. Mutti ◽  
P. Stephen Baenziger ◽  
Robert A. Graybosch ◽  
Roy French ◽  
Kulvinder S. Gill

Crop Science ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Hakizimana ◽  
Amir M. H. Ibrahim ◽  
Marie A. C. Langham ◽  
Scott D. Haley ◽  
Jackie C. Rudd

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laima Urbanavičienė ◽  
Donatas Šneideris ◽  
Marija Žižytė

Plant Disease ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 766-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Price ◽  
F. Workneh ◽  
S. R. Evett ◽  
D. C. Jones ◽  
J. Arthur ◽  
...  

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to determine the effects of Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), a member of the family Potyviridae, on root development and water-use efficiency (WUE) of two hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars, one susceptible and one resistant to WSMV. In the greenhouse studies, wheat cultivars were grown under three water regimes of 30, 60, and 80% soil saturation capacity. After inoculation with WSMV, plants were grown for approximately 4 weeks and then harvested. Root and shoot weights were measured to determine the effect of the disease on biomass. In all water treatments, root biomass and WUE of inoculated susceptible plants were significantly less (P < 0.05) than those of the noninoculated control plants. However, in the resistant cultivar, significance was only found in the 30 and 60% treatments for root weight and WUE, respectively. Field studies were also conducted under three water regimes based on reference evapotranspiration rates. Significant reductions in forage, grain yield, and crop WUE were observed in the inoculated susceptible plots compared with the noninoculated plots. Both studies demonstrated that wheat streak mosaic reduces WUE, which is a major concern in the Texas Panhandle because of limited availability of water.


Crop Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 332-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvano Assanga ◽  
Guorong Zhang ◽  
Chor-Tee Tan ◽  
Jackie C. Rudd ◽  
Amir Ibrahim ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huangjun Lu ◽  
Jacob Price ◽  
Ravindra Devkota ◽  
Charlie Rush ◽  
Jackie Rudd

Euphytica ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Divis ◽  
R. A. Graybosch ◽  
C. J. Peterson ◽  
P. S. Baenziger ◽  
G. L. Hein ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (8) ◽  
pp. 1060-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Miller ◽  
F. Menalled ◽  
D. Ito ◽  
M. Moffet ◽  
M. Burrows

Plant genotype, age, size, and environmental factors can modify susceptibility and tolerance to disease. Understanding the individual and combined impacts of these factors is needed to define improved disease management strategies. In the case of Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) in winter wheat, yield losses and plant susceptibility have been found to be greatest when the crop is exposed to the virus in the fall in the central and southern Great Plains. However, the seasonal dynamics of disease risk may be different in the northern Great Plains, a region characterized by a relatively cooler fall conditions, because temperature is known to modify plant–virus interactions. In a 2-year field study conducted in south-central Montana, we compared the impact of fall and spring WSMV inoculations on the susceptibility, tolerance, yield, and grain quality of 10 winter wheat varieties. Contrary to previous studies, resistance and yields were lower in the spring than in the fall inoculation. In all, 5 to 7% of fall-inoculated wheat plants were infected with WSMV and yields were often similar to uninoculated controls. Spring inoculation resulted in 45 to 57% infection and yields that were 15 to 32% lower than controls. Although all varieties were similarly susceptible to WSMV, variations in tolerance (i.e., yield losses following exposure to the virus) were observed. These results support observations that disease risk and impacts differ across the Great Plains. Possible mechanisms include variation in climate and in the genetic composition of winter wheat and WSMV across the region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document