Participatory Budgeting and Vertical Agriculture: A Thought Experiment in Food System Reform

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane Epting
Nature Food ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Resnick

Author(s):  
Erika Berglund ◽  
Neva Hassanein ◽  
Paul Lachapelle ◽  
Caroline Stephens

For several decades, food policy councils (FPCs) have led the effort to place food on local govern­ment policy agendas. While FPCs are making pro­gress in supporting local food systems, they also face institutional and organizational challenges. In recent years, a handful of cities and counties have endeavored to further food system reform with the establishment of full-time government staff posi­tions focused on food policy. As of spring 2020, there were 19 confirmed food policy positions housed in local governments across the United States. While there is considerable literature on FPCs, little research has been published regarding food policy staffing in local governments. Accordingly, this study uses original in-depth inter­views with 11 individuals in municipal or county food policy positions to understand the purpose and function of governmental food policy staff positions and their impact on local food systems. Our findings suggest that these positions help to coordinate and nurture local food programs and policies and have the potential to facilitate mean­ingful participation of individuals and groups in the community in food system reform. We discuss the potential benefits and challenges for governmental food policy positions to support food democracy, and provide the following recom­mendations for communities interested in estab­lishing or strengthening similar positions: (1) iden­tify and coordinate existing opportunities and assets, (2) foster and maintain leadership support, (3) root the work in community, (4) connect with other food policy professionals, and (5) develop a food system vision.


Author(s):  
Josée Johnston ◽  
Norah MacKendrick

This chapter examines key debates about consumption and food system reform. It begins with a brief overview of the history and characteristics of consumer food politics. It then introduces a typology of consumer food politics in order to examine the different meanings consumers attach to food politics. It considers the “eco-shopping” perspective, which views political food shopping as an opportunity to replace conventional commodities with options that seem less harmful for people, animals, and the environment. This is followed by a discussion of the limits of eco-shopping.


2015 ◽  
pp. 123-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Koshovets ◽  
T. Varkhotov

The paper considers the analogy of theoretical modeling and thought experiment in economics. The authors provide historical and epistemological analysis of thought experiments and their relations to the material experiments in natural science. They conclude that thought experiments as instruments are used both in physics and in economics, but in radically different ways. In the natural science, a thought experiment is tightly connected to the material experimentation, while in economics it is used in isolation. Material experiments serve as a means to demonstrate the reality, while thought experiments cannot be a full-fledged instrument of studying the reality. Rather, they constitute the instrument of structuring the field of inquiry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document