scholarly journals Natural Projection as Partial Model Checking

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 1445-1481
Author(s):  
Gabriele Costa ◽  
Letterio Galletta ◽  
Pierpaolo Degano ◽  
David Basin ◽  
Chiara Bodei

Abstract Verifying the correctness of a system as a whole requires establishing that it satisfies a global specification. When it does not, it would be helpful to determine which modules are incorrect. As a consequence, specification decomposition is a relevant problem from both a theoretical and practical point of view. Until now, specification decomposition has been independently addressed by the control theory and verification communities through natural projection and partial model checking, respectively. We prove that natural projection reduces to partial model checking and, when cast in a common setting, the two are equivalent. Apart from their foundational interest, our results build a bridge whereby the control theory community can reuse algorithms and results developed by the verification community. Furthermore, we extend the notions of natural projection and partial model checking from finite-state to symbolic transition systems and we show that the equivalence still holds. Symbolic transition systems are more expressive than traditional finite-state transition systems, as they can model large systems, whose behavior depends on the data handled, and not only on the control flow. Finally, we present an algorithm for the partial model checking of both kinds of systems that can be used as an alternative to natural projection.

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 859-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMJAD GAWANMEH ◽  
SOFIÈNE TAHAR ◽  
HAJA MOINUDEEN ◽  
ALI HABIBI

In this paper, we propose to integrate an embedding of Property Specification Language (PSL) in Abstract State Machines Language (AsmL) with a top–down design for verification approach in order to enable the model checking of large systems at the early stages of the design process. We provide a complete embedding of PSL in the ASM language AsmL, which allows us to integrate PSL properties as a part of the design. For verification, we propose a technique based on the AsmL tool that translates the code containing both the design and the properties into a finite state machine (FSM) representation. We use the generated FSM to run model checking on an external tool, here SMV. Our approach takes advantage of the AsmL language capabilities to model designs at the system level as well as from the power of the AsmL tool in generating both C# code and FSMs from AsmL models. We applied our approach on the PCI-X bus standard, which AsmL model was constructed from the informal standard specifications and a subsequent UML model. Experimental results on the PCI-X bus case study showed a superiority of our approach to conventional verification.


Author(s):  
Gabriele Costa ◽  
David Basin ◽  
Chiara Bodei ◽  
Pierpaolo Degano ◽  
Letterio Galletta

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen H. Andersen ◽  
Kim G. Larsen

In this paper we present a generalisation of a promising compositional<br /> model-checking technique introduced for finite-state systems by Andersen<br /> in [And95] and extended to networks of timed<br />automata by Larsen et al in [LPY95a, LL95, LPY95b, KLL+97a].<br />In our generalized setting, programs are modelled as arbitrary<br />(possibly infinite-state) transition systems and verified with respect<br />to properties of a basic safety logic. As the fundamental<br />prerequisite of the compositional technique, it is shown how logical<br />properties of a parallel program may be transformed into<br />necessary and sufficient properties of components of the program.<br />Finally, a set of axiomatic laws are provided useful for<br />simplifying formulae and complete with respect to validity and<br />unsatisfiability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Florian Bruse ◽  
Martin Lange ◽  
Etienne Lozes

Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic (HFL) is a modal specification language whose expressive power reaches far beyond that of Monadic Second-Order Logic, achieved through an incorporation of a typed λ-calculus into the modal μ-calculus. Its model checking problem on finite transition systems is decidable, albeit of high complexity, namely k-EXPTIME-complete for formulas that use functions of type order at most k < 0. In this paper we present a fragment with a presumably easier model checking problem. We show that so-called tail-recursive formulas of type order k can be model checked in (k − 1)-EXPSPACE, and also give matching lower bounds. This yields generic results for the complexity of bisimulation-invariant non-regular properties, as these can typically be defined in HFL.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe De Giacomo ◽  
Antonio Di Stasio ◽  
Giuseppe Perelli ◽  
Shufang Zhu

We study the impact of the need for the agent to obligatorily instruct the action stop in her strategies. More specifically we consider synthesis (i.e., planning) for LTLf goals under LTL environment specifications in the case the agent must mandatorily stop at a certain point. We show that this obligation makes it impossible to exploit the liveness part of the LTL environment specifications to achieve her goal, effectively reducing the environment specifications to their safety part only. This has a deep impact on the efficiency of solving the synthesis, which can sidestep handling Buchi determinization associated to LTL synthesis, in favor of finite-state automata manipulation as in LTLf synthesis. Next, we add to the agent goal, expressed in LTLf, a safety goal, expressed in LTL. Safety goals must hold forever, even when the agent stops, since the environment can still continue its evolution. Hence the agent, before stopping, must ensure that her safety goal will be maintained even after she stops. To do synthesis in this case, we devise an effective approach that mixes a synthesis technique based on finite-state automata (as in the case of LTLf goals) and model-checking of nondeterministic Buchi automata. In this way, again, we sidestep Buchi automata determinization, hence getting a synthesis technique that is intrinsically simpler than standard LTL synthesis.


Author(s):  
Henrik Reif Andersen ◽  
Jørgen Staunstrup ◽  
Niels Maretti
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document