scholarly journals Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneet Mittal ◽  
Jonathan P. Piccini ◽  
Jeff Snell ◽  
Julie B. Prillinger ◽  
Nirav Dalal ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Olen ◽  
Brynn E. Dechert ◽  
Anne Foster ◽  
Ronald J. Kanter ◽  
Michael J. Silka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Expert guidance from scientific societies and regulatory agencies recommend a framework of principles for frequency of in-person evaluations and remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. However, there are limited data regarding adherence to recommendations among paediatric electrophysiologists, and there are no data regarding cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing. Methods: To assess current clinical practices for cardiac implantable electronic device in-person evaluation, remote monitoring, and cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing, the Paediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society members were surveyed. The main outcome measures were variations in frequency of in person evaluation, frequency of remote monitoring, and cardiac implantable electronic device-related ancillary testing. Results: All respondents performed in-person evaluation at least once a year, but <50% of respondents performed an in-person evaluation within 2 weeks of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Remote monitoring was performed every 3 months for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators by 71 and 75% respondents, respectively. Follow-up echocardiography was performed every 2–3 years by 53% respondents for patients with >50% ventricular pacing. Majority of respondents (75%) did not perform either an exercise stress test or ambulatory Holter monitoring or chest X-ray (65%) after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Conclusion: This survey identified significant practice variations in cardiac implantable electronic device in- person evaluation, remote monitoring, and ancillary testing practices among paediatric electrophysiologists. Cardiac implantable electronic device management may be optimised by development of a paediatric-specific guidelines for follow-up and ancillary testing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Magnusson ◽  
Jo Ann LeQuang ◽  
Joseph V. Pergolizzi

Postoperative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery may not always be adequately treated. The postoperative pain trajectory occurs over several days following the procedure with tenderness and limited arm range of motion lasting for weeks after surgery. Pain control typically commences in the perioperative period while the patient is in the hospital and may continue after discharge; outpatients may be given a prescription and advice for their analgesic regimen. It is not unusual for CIED patients to be discharged a few hours after implantation. While opioids are known as an effective analgesic to manage acute postoperative pain, growing scrutiny on opioid use as well as their side effects and potential risks have limited their use. Opioids may be considered for appropriate patients for a short course of treatment of acute postoperative pain, but other analgesics may likewise be considered.


EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1007-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cengiz Özcan ◽  
Jakob Raunsø ◽  
Morten Lamberts ◽  
Lars Køber ◽  
Tommi Bo Lindhardt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varunsiri Atti ◽  
Mohit K. Turagam ◽  
Jalaj Garg ◽  
Scott Koerber ◽  
Aakash Angirekula ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 2010-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naga Venkata K. Pothineni ◽  
C. Anwar A. Chahal ◽  
David S. Frankel ◽  
Fermin C. Garcia ◽  
Jay Giri ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document