A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection

Author(s):  
Amir Khanlari ◽  
Mohammad Alhuyi Nazari
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 100838
Author(s):  
Sayyed Hamid Reza Ahmadi ◽  
Younes Noorollahi ◽  
Sasan Ghanbari ◽  
Morteza Ebrahimi ◽  
Hossein Hosseini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Nan Wang ◽  
Ying-Fang Huang ◽  
Yu-Chien Chai ◽  
Van Nguyen

In the context of increasing energy demands in Vietnam, and as a result of the limited supply of domestic energy (oil/gas/coal reserves are exhausted), the potential for renewable energy sources in Vietnam is significant. Thus, building wind power plants in Vietnam is necessary. Access to this type of renewable energy not only contributes to society’s energy supply but also helps to save energy and reduce environmental pollution. Although some works have reviewed applications of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model in wind power plant site selection, little research has focused on this problem in a fuzzy environment. This is the reason why a hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are developed for wind power plant site selection in Vietnam. In the first stages of this research, an FAHP model is proposed for determining the weight of each potential location for building a wind power plant, based on qualitative and quantitative factors. A TOPSIS is applied for ranking all potential alternatives in the final stage. The authors collected data from seven locations, which have good conditions for investment in a wind power plant. The results indicate that Binh Thuan (Binh Thuan Province is located on coast of South Central Vietnam) is the best place for building a wind power plant in Vietnam. The contributions of this work proposed an MCDM approach under fuzzy environments for wind power plant location selection in Vietnam. This paper also resides in the evolution of a new approach that is flexible and practical for a decision-maker. This work also provides a useful guideline for wind power plant location selection in others countries.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Nan Wang ◽  
Ming-Hsien Hsueh ◽  
Da-Fu Lin

Fuel and energy are basic resources necessary to meet a country’s socioeconomic development needs; further, countries rich in these resources have the best premise for meeting the inputs of an economic system; however, this also poses many political challenges and threats to national security. Vietnam is located in the Southeast Asian monsoon-humid tropical region and has diverse fuel-energy resources such as coal, petroleum, and hydropower, along with renewable energy sources such as solar energy, biomass energy, and geothermal energy. However, the reality of economic development in recent years shows complex fluctuations in fuel and energy usage, i.e., besides the export of coal and crude oil, Vietnam still has imported processed oil products. To overcome this issue, many hydrogen power plants will be built in the future. This is why we propose fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (FMCDM) for hydrogen power plant site selection in this research. All criteria affecting location selection are determined by experts and literature reviews, and the weight of all criteria are defined by a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The technique for order of preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a multicriteria decision analysis method, which is used for ranking potential locations in the final stage. As a result, the decision-making unit, DMU010 (DMU010), has become the optimal solution for building hydrogen power plants in Vietnam. A multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model for hydrogen power plant site selection in Vietnam under fuzzy environment conditions is a contribution of this study. This research also provides useful tools for other types of renewable energies in Vietnam and other countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 92-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hassan Mousavi ◽  
Afshin Danehkar ◽  
Mohammad Reza Shokri ◽  
Hadi Poorbagher ◽  
Danial Azhdari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document