Soil microbial loop and nutrient uptake by plants: a test using a coupled C:N model of plant–microbial interactions

2006 ◽  
Vol 287 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 95-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Raynaud ◽  
Jean-Christophe Lata ◽  
Paul W. Leadley
Ecology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 965-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Bohlen ◽  
Peter M. Groffman ◽  
Charles T. Driscoll ◽  
Timothy J. Fahey ◽  
Thomas G. Siccama

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna W.-H. Wong ◽  
Jonathan M. Plett

A major goal in agricultural research is to develop ‘elite’ crops with stronger, resilient root systems. Within this context, breeding practices have focussed on developing plant varieties that are, primarily, able to withstand pathogen attack and, secondarily, able to maximise plant productivity. Although great strides towards breeding disease-tolerant or -resistant root stocks have been made, this has come at a cost. Emerging studies in certain crop species suggest that domestication of crops, together with soil management practices aimed at improving plant yield, may hinder beneficial soil microbial association or reduce microbial diversity in soil. To achieve more sustainable management of agricultural lands, we must not only shift our soil management practices but also our breeding strategy to include contributions from beneficial microbes. For this latter point, we need to advance our understanding of how plants communicate with, and are able to differentiate between, microbes of different lifestyles. Here, we present a review of the key findings on belowground plant–microbial interactions that have been made over the past decade, with a specific focus on how plants and microbes communicate. We also discuss the currently unresolved questions in this area, and propose plausible ways to use currently available research and integrate fast-emerging ‘-omics’ technologies to tackle these questions. Combining past and developing research will enable the development of new crop varieties that will have new, value-added phenotypes belowground.


mBio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kateryna Zhalnina ◽  
Karsten Zengler ◽  
Dianne Newman ◽  
Trent R. Northen

ABSTRACTThe chemistry underpinning microbial interactions provides an integrative framework for linking the activities of individual microbes, microbial communities, plants, and their environments. Currently, we know very little about the functions of genes and metabolites within these communities because genome annotations and functions are derived from the minority of microbes that have been propagated in the laboratory. Yet the diversity, complexity, inaccessibility, and irreproducibility of native microbial consortia limit our ability to interpret chemical signaling and map metabolic networks. In this perspective, we contend that standardized laboratory ecosystems are needed to dissect the chemistry of soil microbiomes. We argue that dissemination and application of standardized laboratory ecosystems will be transformative for the field, much like how model organisms have played critical roles in advancing biochemistry and molecular and cellular biology. Community consensus on fabricated ecosystems (“EcoFABs”) along with protocols and data standards will integrate efforts and enable rapid improvements in our understanding of the biochemical ecology of microbial communities.


2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 2336-2342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flemming Ekelund ◽  
Stephane Saj ◽  
Mette Vestergård ◽  
Joanne Bertaux ◽  
Juha Mikola

Author(s):  
N. N. Lingaraju ◽  
C. S. Hunshal ◽  
S. R. Salakinkop

A field experiment was undertaken during kharif 2012 to study effect of biofertilizers and foliar application of organic acids on yield, nutrient uptake and microbial activity of soybean at MARS, Dharwad under rainfed condition. The experiment was laid out in RCBD factorial having twenty treatment combinations and replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of four P-Solubilizers (PSB, VAM, PSB + VAM and Control) and five foliar spray of organic acids (Humic acid, Lecithin, Citric acid, Maleic acid and control). The results revealed that higher seed yield of soybean (35.96 q ha-1) was obtained with the treatment combination of dual inoculation of PSB+VAM with foliar spray of 0.1% humic acid at flower initiation and was higher to an extent 22.5 per cent compared to control (27.90 q ha-1). Similar trend was observed on microbial activity and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) of the soybean crop.


1975 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Siegel

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
K Pooja ◽  
P Saravanane ◽  
S Nadaradjan ◽  
S Sundaravaradhan ◽  
S Muthukumarasamy ◽  
...  

An experiment was conducted during September 2019 - January 2020 to investigate the effects of cultivars and different weed management practices on yield attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and soil micro-flora in dry direct-seeded rice (DDSR). Experiment was laid out in split plot design replicated thrice. The treatment combination consisted of three levels of cultivars in main plot (ADT 46, CO 52 and Improved white ponni) and five levels of weed management practices in the sub plots (application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha-1 as pre-emergence herbicide at 3 days after sowing (DAS), bispyribac-sodium @ 0.02 kg a.i ha-1 as post-emergence herbicide at 20 DAS, sequential application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha-1 followed by (fb) bispyribac-sodium @ 0.02 kg a.i ha-1, hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS and weedy check). Both the cultivars and weed management practices influenced the growth, nutrient uptake, soil microbial population and yield of the DDSR. However, the interaction did not influence any of the parameters significantly. Rice cultivar ADT 46 proved to be superior with respect to nutrient uptake and yield. Whereas, among weed management practices, the highest nutrient uptake and yield were obtained with sequential application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha-1 fb bispyribac-sodium @ 0.02 kg a.i ha-1.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Keuschnig ◽  
Jean Martins ◽  
Aline Navel ◽  
Pascal Simonet ◽  
Catherine Larose

Microbial analysis at the micro scale of soil is essential to the overall understanding of microbial organization and interactions, and necessary for a better understanding of soil ecosystem functioning. While bacterial communities have been extensively described, little is known about the organization of fungal communities as well as functional potentials at scales relevant to microbial interactions. Fungal and bacterial communities and changes in nitrogen cycling potentials in the pristine Rothamsted Park Grass soil (bulk soil) as well as in its particle size sub-fractions (PSFs; > 250 µm, 250-63 µm, 63-20 µm, 20-2 µm, < 2 µm and supernatant) were studied. The potential for nitrogen reduction was found elevated in bigger aggregates. The relative abundance of Basidiomycota deceased with decreasing particle size, Ascomycota showed an increase and Mucoromycota became more prominent in particles less than 20 µm. Bacterial community structures changed below 20 µm at the scale where microbes operate.Strikingly, only members of two bacterial and one fungal phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota and Ascomycota, respectively) were washed-off the soil during fractionation and accumulated in the supernatant fraction where most of the detected bacterial genera (e.g., Pseudomonas, Massilia, Mucilaginibacter, Edaphobaculum, Duganella, Janthinobacterium and Variovorax) were previously associated with exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation.Overall, the applied method shows potential to study soil microbial communities at micro scales which might be useful in studies focusing on the role of specific fungal taxa in soil structure formation as well as research on how and by whom biofilm-like structures are distributed and organized in soil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document