Do Predictors of the Implementation Quality of School-Based Prevention Programs Differ by Program Type?

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Ann Payne
2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Knowlton W. Johnson ◽  
Kristen A. Ogilvie ◽  
David A. Collins ◽  
Stephen R. Shamblen ◽  
Lisa G. Dirks ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Katherine Dowling ◽  
Margaret M. Barry

School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs can be effective in producing positive outcomes for students. However, when the implementation quality is poor, these programs often lose their effectiveness and fail to produce the expected positive outcomes. The current study evaluates a school-based SEL program for 15–18-year-olds in Ireland by determining the impact of implementation quality on program outcomes. The study also examines the effects on outcomes of different implementation dimensions including Dosage, Adherence, Quality of Delivery, and Participant Responsiveness. Employing a cluster randomized controlled trial design, this study collected student outcome data (n = 675) from 32 disadvantaged schools across three time points (pre-, post-, 12-month follow-up) and compared these data across three treatment groups (high-implementation, low-implementation, and control). Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to determine the relationships between the implementation data and student outcome data longitudinally. The findings revealed that the positive effects of the program were only observed with the high-, but not the low-implementation group (reduced suppression of emotions (p = 0.049); reduced avoidance coping (p = 0.006); increased social support coping (p = 0.009); reduced levels of stress (p = 0.035) and depressive symptoms (p = 0.025). The comparison of implementation dimensions revealed that only Quality of Delivery had a significant effect on all of the tested outcomes. This study highlights the importance of high-quality implementation in producing positive outcomes and supports the need to evaluate implementation using multiple dimensions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne P. McNamara ◽  
Cecyle K. Perry

A national survey of school-based speech-language pathologists was conducted to assess current practices regarding prevention of functional voice disorders. More than 80% of the 145 respondents did not have vocal abuse prevention programs primarily because of time constraints and the low incidence/low priority they assigned to voice problems. Twenty-seven speech-language pathologists had vocal abuse/misuse programs for groups of asymptomatic and symptomatic children who were primarily in the elementary grades. Positive attitudes about the quality of training received in prevention and treatment of voice disorders, belief in the importance and effectiveness of voice prevention, and belief that hoarseness is caused by vocal misuse/abuse were associated with those who had voice prevention programs.


2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Townsend ◽  
Steven B. Pokorny ◽  
Leonard A. Jason ◽  
Carrie J. Curie ◽  
Michael E. Schoeny

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Becker ◽  
Dana Darney ◽  
Celene Domitrovich ◽  
Catherine Bradshaw ◽  
Nicholas S. Ialongo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document