Vocal Abuse Prevention Practices

1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne P. McNamara ◽  
Cecyle K. Perry

A national survey of school-based speech-language pathologists was conducted to assess current practices regarding prevention of functional voice disorders. More than 80% of the 145 respondents did not have vocal abuse prevention programs primarily because of time constraints and the low incidence/low priority they assigned to voice problems. Twenty-seven speech-language pathologists had vocal abuse/misuse programs for groups of asymptomatic and symptomatic children who were primarily in the elementary grades. Positive attitudes about the quality of training received in prevention and treatment of voice disorders, belief in the importance and effectiveness of voice prevention, and belief that hoarseness is caused by vocal misuse/abuse were associated with those who had voice prevention programs.

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 919-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
LOUISE ANN ROHRBACH ◽  
CAROL N. D'ONOFRIO ◽  
THOMAS E. BACKER ◽  
SUSANNE B. MONTGOMERY

1987 ◽  
Vol 169 (3) ◽  
pp. 80-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Forbes

The paper questions the individualism inherent in many prevention programs and argues that the recent drug scare has intensified some programs' social control functions. Responding to pressure from corporations and the breakdown of traditional socializing agencies, schools have assumed greater responsibility for students' moral behavior. Through drug abuse prevention programs in particular, schools have encouraged the accumulation of social skills as a means to ensure success, and they have increasingly applied authoritarian sanctions along with psychological manipulations in an attempt to regulate student behavior. This paper suggests an alternative model for drug abuse prevention along the lines of Paolo Freire's and Ira Shor's dialogical education.


2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla R. Brassard ◽  
Christina M. Fiorvanti

1988 ◽  
Vol 170 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariamne H. Whatley ◽  
Bonnie Trudell

In response to the problem of child sexual abuse, there has been a proliferation of school-based prevention programs. In conjunction with the children's programs, there have also been efforts to develop a parent education component. After examining the potential roles for adult caretakers in school sexual abuse prevention programs, we raise issues that should be considered before such programs are implemented. These issues include: the necessity of developing a true “partnership” between school and community; the possible unintended consequence of deskilling parents; the recognition that adults sought as “partners” in these programs might actually be abusers; the use of such gender-neutral terms as “abusive parent” which serve to disguise who actually abuses and who is held responsible for protecting the child; the reaction to what is perceived as intervention in the family. These issues are crucial to consider, because a haphazard approach to parental involvement could cause damage to the program, as well as to the trust that is necessary between educators and parents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document