Mental Health Service Use Before and After Diagnosis of Early-Onset Bipolar Disorder

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Evans-Lacko ◽  
Susan dosReis ◽  
Elizabeth Kastelic ◽  
Anne W. Riley
BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Cunningham ◽  
Marie Crowe ◽  
James Stanley ◽  
Tracy Haitana ◽  
Suzanne Pitama ◽  
...  

Background Despite evidence of gender differences in bipolar disorder characteristics and comorbidity, there is little research on the differences in treatment and service use between men and women with bipolar disorder. Aims To use routine data to describe specialist mental health service contact for bipolar disorder, including in-patient, community and support service contacts; to compare clinical characteristics and mental health service use between men and women in contact with secondary services for bipolar disorder. Method Cross-sectional analysis of mental health patients with bipolar disorder in New Zealand, based on complete national routine health data. Results A total of 3639 individuals were in contact with specialist mental health services with a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder in 2015. Of these 58% were women and 46% were aged 45 and over. The 1-year prevalence rate of bipolar disorder leading to contact with specialist mental health services was 1.56 (95% CI 1.50–1.63) per 100 000 women and 1.20 (95% CI 1.14–1.26) per 100 000 men. Rates of bipolar disorder leading to service contact were 30% higher in women than men (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.22–1.39). The majority (68%) had a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder. Women were more likely to receive only out-patient treatment and have comorbid anxiety whereas more men had substance use disorder, were convicted for crimes when unwell, received compulsory treatment orders and received in-patient treatment. Conclusions Although the prevalence of bipolar disorder is equal between men and women in the population, women were more likely to have contact with specialist services for bipolar disorder but had a lower intensity of service interaction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Simon ◽  
K. Budge ◽  
J. Price ◽  
G.M. Goodwin ◽  
J.R. Geddes

AbstractBackground:Remote monitoring of mood disorders may be an effective and low resource option for patient follow-up, but relevant evidence remains very limited. This study explores real-life compliance and health services impacts of mood monitoring among patients with bipolar disorder in the UK.Methods:Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder who were registered users of the True Colours monitoring system for at least 12 months at study assessment were included in this retrospective cohort study (n = 79). Compliance was measured as the proportion of valid depression and mania scale messages received in comparison to their expected numbers over the first 12 months of monitoring. Mental health service use data were extracted from case notes, costed using national unit costs, and compared 12 months before (pre-TC period) and 12 months after (TC period) patients’ engagement with monitoring. Associations with relevant patient factors were investigated in a multiple regression model.Results:Average compliance with monitoring was 82%. Significant increases in the annual use and costs of psychiatrist contacts and total mental health services were shown for patients newly referred to the clinic during the pre-TC period but not for long-term patients of the clinic. Psychiatric medication costs increased significantly between the pre-TC and TC periods (£ 235, P = 0.005) unrelated to patients’ referral status.Conclusions:Remote mood monitoring has good compliance among consenting patients with bipolar disorder. We found no associations between observed changes in mental health service costs and the introduction of monitoring except for the increase in psychiatric medication costs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin A. Depp ◽  
Laurie A. Lindamer ◽  
David P. Folsom ◽  
Todd Gilmer ◽  
Richard L. Hough ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina B. Gee ◽  
Gagan S. Khera ◽  
Alyssa T. Poblete ◽  
Barunie Kim ◽  
Syeda Y. Buchwach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document