scholarly journals Return to Work After Shoulder Replacement for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Is Similar When Hemiarthroplasty Is Compared to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-217
Author(s):  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Grant H. Garcia ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Gregory Mahony ◽  
Alec Sinatro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using OVO®/OVO® Motion with Inlay Glenoid Shoulder Arthroplasty System

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sercan Yalcin ◽  
Michael Scarcella ◽  
Anthony Miniaci
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
The United States ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
High Demand ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Shoulder Arthritis ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

The incidence of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been steadily increasing in the United States. TSA with humeral head resurfacing with an inlay glenoid using OVO®/OVO® Motion (Arthrosurface, Inc., Franklin, Massachusetts) is an anatomic implant solution to shoulder arthritis. Anatomic resurfacing has demonstrated promising clinical- and patient-reported outcomes in the literature in both active and low-demand patients. Furthermore, patients are capable of returning to high-demand activities, such as weightlifting, which are restricted with conventional total shoulder replacement designs. Resurfacing designs offer a simple solution to a complex problem.

scholarly journals Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
Raffaele Garofalo
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Final Destination ◽  
Component Loosening

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.

Risk factors for failing to achieve improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory T. Mahony ◽  
Brian C. Werner ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Brian M. Grawe ◽  
Samuel A. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Patient age affects expectations and outcomes in primary total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Jeremiah T. Lowe ◽  
Mariano E. Menendez ◽  
Umer Dasti ◽  
Kuhan A. Mahendraraj ◽  
Suzanne Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Patient Âgé ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

scholarly journals Early migration of stemless and stemmed humeral components after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis—study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Randall Kristensen Nyring ◽  
Bo S. Olsen ◽  
Müjgan Yilmaz ◽  
Michael M. Petersen ◽  
Gunnar Flivik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Abstract Background Glenohumeral osteoarthritis can, in the most severe cases, require surgery with insertion of a shoulder arthroplasty. A design with a stem in the humeral bone canal is currently regarded as the standard treatment option in patients who have an intact rotator cuff function, but complications related to the stem including humeral fractures can have devastating consequences. By using a stemless humeral component, stem-related complications can be reduced. The aim of this study is to compare the Comprehensive Nano stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (intervention group) with the Comprehensive stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty (control group). Materials and methods This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the stemless and the stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty. All Danish citizens with glenohumeral osteoarthritis indicating a total shoulder arthroplasty referred to the orthopedic department at Copenhagen University Hospital in Herlev/Gentofte will be offered participation. The following exclude from participation: below 18 years of age, cognitive or linguistic impairment, insufficient function of the rotator cuff, poor bone quality, and ASA groups 4–5. A total of 122 patients will be included of which 56 will be part of a radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study of humeral component migration. The primary outcomes are magnitude of migration of the humeral component assessed by RSA and patient-reported outcome by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS). The secondary outcomes are additional patient-reported outcomes, functional outcome, readmission, complications, revisions, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal humerus assessed by duel energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and economy (cost-utility analysis). The patients are examined before the operation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperative. Discussion To our knowledge, RSA has never been used to access migration of a stemmed or a stemless humeral component nor has the stemmed and the stemless humeral component been compared with regard to pain relief and shoulder function in a randomized clinical trial. Today, the two designs are considered equal in the treatment of osteoarthritis. The study will provide surgeons and patients with information about shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and assist them in decision-making. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04105478. Registered on 25 September 2019

What are the costs of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in the year prior to a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA)?

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
Azeem Tariq Malik ◽  
Julie Y Bishop ◽  
Andrew Neviaser ◽  
Nikhil Jain ◽  
Safdar N Khan
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document