Optimal control model of an enterprise for single and inheriting periods of carbon emission reduction

Author(s):  
Jin Liang ◽  
Wenlin Huang
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jin Liang ◽  
Wenlin Huang

In this paper, we develop an optimal control model of companies for the inheriting period, during which interphase banking and borrowing of allowances are allowable. By considering the emission reduction policy and the initial auction amount, we optimize the problem in two steps. The model is then converted into a two-dimensional Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation. The numerical results, analysis, and comparisons are presented. Finally, we highlight several policy implications from the perspectives of companies and governments.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1810
Author(s):  
Kaitong Xu ◽  
Haibo Kang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Na Li

At present, the issue of carbon emissions from buildings has become a hot topic, and carbon emission reduction is also becoming a political and economic contest for countries. As a result, the government and researchers have gradually begun to attach great importance to the industrialization of low-carbon and energy-saving buildings. The rise of prefabricated buildings has promoted a major transformation of the construction methods in the construction industry, which is conducive to reducing the consumption of resources and energy, and of great significance in promoting the low-carbon emission reduction of industrial buildings. This article mainly studies the calculation model for carbon emissions of the three-stage life cycle of component production, logistics transportation, and on-site installation in the whole construction process of composite beams for prefabricated buildings. The construction of CG-2 composite beams in Fujian province, China, was taken as the example. Based on the life cycle assessment method, carbon emissions from the actual construction process of composite beams were evaluated, and that generated by the composite beam components during the transportation stage by using diesel, gasoline, and electric energy consumption methods were compared in detail. The results show that (1) the carbon emissions generated by composite beams during the production stage were relatively high, accounting for 80.8% of the total carbon emissions, while during the transport stage and installation stage, they only accounted for 7.6% and 11.6%, respectively; and (2) during the transportation stage with three different energy-consuming trucks, the carbon emissions from diesel fuel trucks were higher, reaching 186.05 kg, followed by gasoline trucks, which generated about 115.68 kg; electric trucks produced the lowest, only 12.24 kg.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document