Importance of primary care for underserved cancer patients with multiple chronic conditions

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn K. Jetelina ◽  
Simon Craddock Lee ◽  
Quiera S. Booker-Nubie ◽  
Udoka C. Obinwa ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions

scholarly journals HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ EXPERIENCES IN CARING FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH MULTIPLE CHRONIC CONDITIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S317-S318
Author(s):  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Marie-Lee Yous ◽  
Kimberly Fraser ◽  
Sinéad Dufour ◽  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Personal Support

Abstract The management of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) in older adults living in the community is complex. Little is known about the experiences of interdisciplinary primary care and home providers who care for this vulnerable group. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare providers in managing the care of community-living older adults with MCC and to highlight their recommendations for improving care delivery for this group. A qualitative interpretive description design was used. A total of 42 healthcare providers from two provinces in Canada participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants represented diverse disciplines (e.g., physicians, nurses, social workers, personal support workers) and settings (e.g., primary care and home care). Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. The experiences of healthcare providers managing care for older adults with MCC were organized into six major themes: (1) managing complexity associated with MCC, (2) implementing person-centred care, (3), involving and supporting family caregivers, (4) using a team approach for holistic care delivery, (5) encountering rewards and challenges in caring for older adults with MCC, and (6) recommending ways to address the challenges of the healthcare system. Healthcare providers highlighted the need for a more comprehensive integrated system of care to improve care management for older adults with MCC and their family caregivers. Specifically, they suggested increased care coordination, more comprehensive primary care visits with an interprofessional team, and increased home care support.

Primary care oncology model (PCOM): Implementation of a model integrating primary and oncology care for patients taking oral anticancer agents.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1587-TPS1587
Author(s):  
Emily R. Mackler ◽  
Karen B. Farris ◽  
Katie S. Gatwood ◽  
Amna Rizvi-Toner ◽  
Alex Wallace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Hiv Intervention ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Chronic Medications ◽  
Oral Anticancer Agents

TPS1587 Background: Non-adherence to oral anticancer agents (OAA) has been reported among 30% of individuals. Often, individuals with cancer are not just managing their new OAA but also medications to treat multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Multiple factors contribute to the extent patients on OAAs and MCC medications adhere to therapy. The objective of this study is to improve medication, symptom, and disease management of patients with hematological malignancies and MCC through care coordination between pharmacists. Methods: Design. This is a multi-center prospective single arm pilot study at two academic medical centers in Michigan and Tennessee. Subjects. Ninety participants will be recruited, 60 from site 1 and 30 from site 2. Inclusion criteria are: adults > 18 years, diagnosed with and initiating oral treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or multiple myeloma, diagnoses of at least 2 chronic conditions, where one is type 2 diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, depression/anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, taking at least two chronic medications, and able to provide electronic consent. Exclusion criteria are: inability to speak English, and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes or HIV. Intervention. Participants will complete two Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for their OAA that will be reviewed by the oncology pharmacist, with follow-up to the care team if needed. Participants will be scheduled for a Comprehensive Medication Review with a primary care pharmacist for up to two visits for their chronic medications. The intervention over 2 months, and the oncology and primary care pharmacists communicate via electronic health record about medications, symptoms, and disease control. Outcomes. The primary endpoints are (a) dose-adjusted adherence by proportion days covered (PDC) for the OAA and (b) PDC for chronic condition medications, assessed using 6 months of prescription claims. Data will be collected from patients using REDCap surveys and abstracted data will be entered into REDCap. Implementation by pharmacists and patient acceptability will be examined. Analysis. The association of OAA and chronic medication adherence (PDC) will be examined via correlation. Participant demographics,clinical characteristics, and the symptom experience from the PROM will be described. Using CMR results, medication problems, recommendations, and changes will be provided. Program implementation will be assessed and patient perceptions obtained from post-CMR interviews. A joint display for the quantitative and qualitative data for feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability from pharmacists will be completed. Results: Screening and recruitment has begun. Clinical trial information: NCT04595851 and NCT04663100.

Association of adult attachment and suicidal ideation in primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg ◽  
Karoline Lukaschek ◽  
Katja Brenk-Franz ◽  
Bernhard Strauß ◽  
Jochen Gensichen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Primary Care Patients

scholarly journals Identifying and addressing gaps in the implementation of a community care team for care of Patients with multiple chronic conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasey R. Boehmer ◽  
Diane E. Holland ◽  
Catherine E. Vanderboom
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Community Programs ◽  
Community Healthcare ◽  
Science Framework ◽  
Implementation Gaps

Abstract Background Patients with multiple chronic conditions represent a growing segment for healthcare. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) supports leveraging community programs to support patients and their caregivers overwhelmed by their treatment plans, but this component has lagged behind the adoption of other model elements. Community Care Teams (CCTs) leverage partnerships between healthcare delivery systems and existing community programs to address this deficiency. There remains a gap in moving CCTs from pilot phase to sustainable full-scale programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the cognitive and structural needs of clinicians, social workers, and nurse care coordinators to effectively refer appropriate patients to the CCT and the value these stakeholders derived from referring to and receiving feedback from the CCT. We then sought to translate this knowledge into an implementation toolkit to bridge implementation gaps. Methods Our research process was guided by the Assess, Innovate, Develop, Engage, and Devolve (AIDED) implementation science framework. During the Assess process we conducted chart reviews, interviews, and observations and in Innovate and Develop phases, we worked with stakeholders to develop an implementation toolkit. The Engage and Devolve phases disseminate the toolkit through social networks of clinical champions and are ongoing. Results We completed 14 chart reviews, 11 interviews, and 2 observations. From these, facilitators and barriers to CCT referrals and patient re-integration into primary care were identified. These insights informed the development of a toolkit with seven components to address implementation gaps identified by the researchers and stakeholders. Conclusion We identified implementation gaps to sustaining the CCT program, a community-healthcare partnership, and used this information to build an implementation toolkit. We established liaisons with clinical champions to diffuse this information. The AIDED Model, not previously used in high-income countries’ primary care settings, proved adaptable and useful.

scholarly journals Healthcare Use in Multimorbidity Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Quinaz Romana ◽  
I Kislaya ◽  
S Cunha Goncalves ◽  
M R Salvador ◽  
B Nunes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Health Examination ◽  
Healthcare Use ◽  
Medical Specialist ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Male And Female

Abstract Background The existence of multiple chronic conditions in the same patient is a public health problem, recognized as relevant to health systems. Individuals with multimorbidity have additional health needs, which in the context of continuous increase of life expectancy, imply a heavy burden to healthcare services. Methods We analysed the association between healthcare use (primary care, medical specialist consultations and hospitalizations) and multimorbidity in the Portuguese population aged 25-74 years old, using the Health Examination Survey (n = 4911) data. Logistic regression models adjusted for predisposing (age, education) and enabling (income, region of residence) factors were fitted separately for male and female. Odds ratios and CI95% were estimated. Results Prevalence of multimorbidity was 38.3% (95%CI: 35.4%; 41.3%). In males, after adjustment for confounding and when compared to patients without chronic conditions, multimorbidity was associated with greater use of primary care (OR = 3.7; CI95%: 2.3-5.8), medical specialist consultations (OR = 1.9; CI95%: 1.1-3.4) and hospitalizations (OR = 1.8; CI95%: 1.2-2.7). In female, statistically significant association between multimorbidity and healthcare use was observed for primary care (OR = 2.6; CI95%: 1.6-4.3) and medical specialist consultations (OR = 2.8; CI95%: 2.0-3.9), but not for hospitalizations. Both male and female with multimorbidity reported greater use of primary care, compared to individuals with only one chronic condition (OR = 2.4; CI95%: 1.3-4.4 and OR = 1.7; CI95%: 1.1-2.8, respectively). Conclusions Our results show a greater healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity, both in primary and hospital care. The availability of scientific evidence regarding the healthcare use, by patients with multimorbidity, may substantiate the discussion about the possible need for the Portuguese health system to adapt to these patients, with changes in policies that will allow better and more efficient treatment. Key messages This study may support the discussion about the adaptation of Portuguese health system to patitents with multimorbidity. Further discussion on policy change is needed, targeting an efficient management of these patients.

Chronic conditions among advanced cancer patients and their spouse caregivers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Dana Ketcher ◽  
Amy Otto ◽  
Maija Reblin
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Psychological Consequences ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Spouse Caregivers

20 Background: Chronic conditions and multimorbidity have been recognized to have negative impacts on costs of healthcare, quality of care, and well-being. The interdependence of patients and caregivers has also been highlighted, in that patient factors can impact caregiver outcomes and vice versa. Yet little research has been conducted on how the number of other health conditions among spouse caregivers (CGs) and advanced cancer patients impact their own and their partners’ well-being. Methods: Data were gathered as part of a prospective observational study of couples coping with advanced cancer. Patients had to have a cohabiting spouse/partner who identified as providing some care and also agreed to participate. Results: Patients rated their overall health slightly worse (scale 1-5, M = 2.85, SD = 0.95) than CGs ( M = 2.27, SD = 0.75). Patients also reported more total conditions ( M = 2.59, SD = 1.42) than CGs ( M = 1.4, SD = 1.14). Most patients (81%) reported at least one chronic condition other than cancer (44% of patients reported at least two other conditions); the most common conditions among patients were hypertension (43%), lung disease (36%), arthritis, and diabetes (both 24%). About 23% of CGs reported having no chronic conditions; 36% reported at least one and 41% reported at least two. The most common conditions among CGs were arthritis (40%), hypertension (39%), and heart disease, diabetes, and cancer (13% each). A greater number of CG conditions predicted greater depression symptoms in the patient ( B = 0.60, p = .040), controlling for patient conditions. More conditions among patients was a significant predictor of less patient social support ( B = -0.67, p = .017) and a marginally-significant predictor of greater perceived stress among caregivers ( B = -0.27, p = .064). A history of CG cancer predicted greater depression symptoms in the patient ( B = 2.3, p = .02). Conclusions: Chronic conditions and multimorbidity can have significant psychological consequences for both patient and CG. Clinicians, in addition to making an active effort to incorporate CGs into medical decision making and treatment planning, should also be aware of patient and caregiver multiple chronic conditions in order to provide more holistic care for patients.

Patient-provider relationship as mediator between adult attachment and self-management in primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 131-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Brenk-Franz ◽  
Bernhard Strauß ◽  
Fabian Tiesler ◽  
Christian Fleischhauer ◽  
Nico Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Primary Care Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document