Multimodal Registration and Fusion of In Situ and Ex Situ Metal Additive Manufacturing Data

JOM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Donegan ◽  
Edwin J. Schwalbach ◽  
Michael A. Groeber
Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (17) ◽  
pp. 4929
Author(s):  
Teng Yang ◽  
Sangram Mazumder ◽  
Yuqi Jin ◽  
Brian Squires ◽  
Mathew Sofield ◽  
...  

Additive manufacturing technologies based on metal are evolving into an essential advanced manufacturing tool for constructing prototypes and parts that can lead to complex structures, dissimilar metal-based structures that cannot be constructed using conventional metallurgical techniques. Unlike traditional manufacturing processes, the metal AM processes are unreliable due to variable process parameters and a lack of conventionally acceptable evaluation methods. A thorough understanding of various diagnostic techniques is essential to improve the quality of additively manufactured products and provide reliable feedback on the manufacturing processes for improving the quality of the products. This review summarizes and discusses various ex-situ inspections and in-situ monitoring methods, including electron-based methods, thermal methods, acoustic methods, laser breakdown, and mechanical methods, for metal additive manufacturing.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Alldredge ◽  
John Slotwinski ◽  
Steven Storck ◽  
Sam Kim ◽  
Arnold Goldberg ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 431-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Everton ◽  
Matthias Hirsch ◽  
Petros Stravroulakis ◽  
Richard K. Leach ◽  
Adam T. Clare

MRS Bulletin ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 927-933
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Wenda Tan ◽  
Lianyi Chen ◽  
Anthony Rollett

Abstract


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Min Roh ◽  
Soundar R. T. Kumara ◽  
Hui Yang ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Paul Witherell ◽  
...  

Abstract Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) provides a larger design space with accompanying manufacturability than traditional manufacturing. Recently, much research has focused on simulating the MAM process with regards to part geometry, porosity, and microstructure properties. Despite continued advances, MAM processes have many variables that are not well understood with respect to their effect on the part quality. With the common use of in-situ sensors — such as CMOS cameras and infrared cameras — numerous, real-time datasets can be captured and analyzed for monitoring both the process and the part. However, currently, real-time data predominantly focuses on the build failure and process anomalies by capturing the printing defects (cracks/peel-off). A large amount of data — such as melt pool geometries and temperature gradients — are just beginning to be explored, along with their connections to final part quality. Towards investigating these connections, in this paper we propose models that capture numerous sensor capabilities and associate them with the corresponding, real-time, physical phenomena. These sensor models lay the foundation for a comprehensive, knowledge framework that forms the basis for quality monitoring and management of MAM process outcomes. Using our previously developed process ontology model [1–3], which describes the relationship between process variables and process outcomes, we can discover the relationship between the real-time, physical phenomena and the deviations in the targeted, build quality. For example, statistically significant sensor data that predicts deviations from targeted process qualities can be detected and used to control the process parameters. Case studies that scope the physical phenomena and sensor data are provided for verifying the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed qualification and certification models.


Author(s):  
Davide Cannizzaro ◽  
Antonio Giuseppe Varrella ◽  
Stefano Paradiso ◽  
Roberta Sampieri ◽  
Yukai Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document