Aspirin, Statins, and Primary Prevention: Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Jhaveri ◽  
Rachel A. Sibley ◽  
Erica S. Spatz ◽  
John Dodson
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1040-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyce Mei-Shiuan Kuo ◽  
Berry Thavalathil ◽  
Glyn Elwyn ◽  
Zsuzsanna Nemeth ◽  
Stuti Dang

Background. Shared decision making (SDM) involves the sharing of best available evidence between patients and providers in the face of difficult decisions. We examine outcomes that occur when electronic health records (EHRs) are purposefully used with the goal of improving SDM and detail which EHR functions can benefit SDM. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed yielded 1369 articles. Studies were included only if they used EHR interventions to support SDM and included results that showed impact on SDM. Articles were excluded if they did not measure the impact of the intervention on SDM or did not discuss how SDM had been supported by the EHR. Results. Five studies demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, positive lifestyle behavior changes, more deliberation from patients regarding use of imaging, and less decisional conflict about medication use among patients with use of EHRs aiding SDM. Discussion. Few EHRs have integrated SDM, and even fewer evaluations of these exist. EHRs have potential in supporting providers during all steps of SDM. The promise of EHRs to support SDM has yet to be fully exploited.


2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1834
Author(s):  
Siqin Ye ◽  
Aaron Leppin ◽  
Amy Chan ◽  
Nancy Chang ◽  
Nathalie Moise ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Omar Dzaye ◽  
Cara Reiter-Brennan ◽  
Albert D. Osei ◽  
Olusola A. Orimoloye ◽  
S. M. Iftekhar Uddin ◽  
...  

The 2018 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) cholesterol management guideline considers current evidence on coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing while incorporating learnings from previous guidelines. More than any previous guideline update, this set encourages CAC testing to facilitate shared decision making and to individualize treatment plans. An important novelty is further separation of risk groups. Specifically, the current prevention guideline recommends CAC testing for primary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention among asymptomatic patients in borderline and intermediate risk groups (5–7.5% and 7.5–20% 10-year ASCVD risk). This additional sub-classification reflects the uncertainty of treatment strategies for patients broadly considered to be “intermediate risk,” as treatment recommendations for high and low risk groups are well established. The 2018 guidelines, for the first time, clearly recognize the significance of a CAC score of zero, where intensive statin therapy is likely not beneficial and not routinely recommended in selected patients. Lifestyle modification should be the focus in patients with CAC = 0. In this article, we review the recent AHA/ACC cholesterol management guideline and contextualize the transition of CAC testing to a guideline-endorsed decision aid for borderline-to-intermediate risk patients who seek more definitive risk assessment as part of a clinician-patient discussion. CAC testing can reduce low-value treatment and focus primary prevention therapy on those most likely to benefit.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (24) ◽  
pp. 2539-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Fontana ◽  
Perviz Asaria ◽  
Michela Moraldo ◽  
Judith Finegold ◽  
Khalil Hassanally ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-109
Author(s):  
Amr F. Barakat ◽  
Anum Asif ◽  
Ana Inashvili ◽  
Libby Szeto ◽  
Ahmed Noor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document