scholarly journals Does a Modified Gap-balancing Technique Result in Medial-pivot Knee Kinematics in Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty?: A Pilot Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 470 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Fitz ◽  
Sonal Sodha ◽  
William Reichmann ◽  
Tom Minas
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 964-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kitagawa ◽  
Nobuhiro Tsumura ◽  
Takaaki Chin ◽  
Kazuyoshi Gamada ◽  
Scott A. Banks ◽  
...  

The Knee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Cardinale ◽  
Laura Bragonzoni ◽  
Marco Bontempi ◽  
Domenico Alesi ◽  
Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2338-2345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Matsumoto ◽  
Seiji Kubo ◽  
Hirotsugu Muratsu ◽  
Takehiko Matsushita ◽  
Kazunari Ishida ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1599-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kitagawa ◽  
Kazunari Ishida ◽  
Takaaki Chin ◽  
Nobuhiro Tsumura ◽  
Tetsushiro Iguchi

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Wui Guan Ng ◽  
Benjamin V. Bloch ◽  
Peter J. James

Multi radius (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with mid-flexion instability. Single radius (SR) TKA may provide better anteroposterior stability through single flexion axis and biomechanical advantage for quadriceps function. Medial pivot (MP) TKA and gradually reducing (GR) radius TKA produce better knee kinematics. Clinical outcomes are equivalent for SR, MR and MP TKA. Short-term studies have shown better clinical outcomes and kinematics for GR TKA. Thinner and narrow anterior flange, deeper trochlea groove and more anatomical trochlea design reduces patellofemoral complications in TKA Ultracongruent inserts provide comparable clinical outcomes to posterior-stabilized TKA and cruciate retaining TKA.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:519-524. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180083


Author(s):  
Qida Zhang ◽  
Zhenxian Chen ◽  
Zhifeng Zhang ◽  
Zhongmin Jin ◽  
Orhun K Muratoglu ◽  
...  

Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has several potential advantages including improved anteroposterior knee stability compared to contemporary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have explored whether there is significant differences of knee biomechanics following bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared to posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. In the present study, subject-specific lower extremity musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics models for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were developed based on the musculoskeletal modeling framework using force-dependent kinematics method and validated against in vivo telemetric data. The experiment data of two subjects who underwent total knee arthroplasty were obtained for the SimTK “Grand Challenge Competition” repository, and integrated into the musculoskeletal model. Five walking gait trials for each subject were used as partial inputs for the model to predict the knee biomechanics for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The results revealed significantly greater range of anterior/posterior tibiofemoral translation, and significantly more posterior tibial location during the early phase of gait and more anterior tibial location during the late phase of gait were found in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty without anterior cruciate ligament when compared to the bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. No significant differences in tibiofemoral contact forces, rotations, translations, and ligament forces between bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during normal walking gait, albeit slight differences in range of tibiofemoral internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior translation were observed. The present study revealed that anterior cruciate ligament retention has a positive effect on restoring normal knee kinematics in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Preservation of anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty and knee implant designs interplay each other and both contribute to restoring normal knee kinematics in different types of total knee arthroplasty. Further evaluation of more demanding activities and subject data from patients with bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty via musculoskeletal modeling may better highlight the role of the anterior cruciate ligament and its stabilizing influence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 2883-2892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bontempi ◽  
Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina ◽  
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli ◽  
Nicola Pizza ◽  
Umberto Cardinale ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document